Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Estate of Mazanec, 283 N.W. 745.

28 citing documents.

Ronald G. Davis, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger F. Davis and Trustee of the Toivo W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
But “Inequality of distribution is not proof sufficient to support a finding of undue influence.” Mazanec v. Mazanec ( In re Mazanec’s Est.), see also Ristau, d at 104 (affirming summary judgment rejecting undue-influence claim despite inequality of distributions among family members).
A20-0508 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Appellants again argue that decedent had a discernable reason to not give Wayne and Dale land distributions and that “[t]he fact that not all children are treated equ ally under a will is insufficient grounds for finding undue influence,” citing In re Mazanec’s Estate
In Re the Estate of Ristau 399 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Estate of Ristau 399 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Estate of Anthony 265 Minn. 382 Minn. 1963
In Re Estate of Anthony 265 Minn. 382 Minn. 1963
[2] In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , ; In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1, 9 , 13 N.W.
In Re Estate of Holden 261 Minn. 527 Minn. 1962
Larsen v. Bjerke 113 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1962
In Re Estate of Holden 261 Minn. 527 Minn. 1962
The law applicable to this phase of the case is so adequately and completely stated in In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , , and In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1 , 13 N.W.
Larsen v. Bjerke 113 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1962
The law applicable to this phase of the case is so adequately and completely stated in In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , , and In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1 , 13 N. W. (2d) 765 , that it could serve no useful purpose to repeat it here.
In Re Estate of Reay 249 Minn. 123 Minn. 1957
In Re Estate of Reay 249 Minn. 123 Minn. 1957
(2d) 765, 770 ; In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406, 411, 412 , 748 ; 20 Dunnell, Dig.
Sorlie v. Thomas 51 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1952
Sorlie v. Thomas 51 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1952
In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , .
Borstad v. Ulstad 45 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1951
Borstad v. Ulstad 45 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1951
See, In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , , which so well collects the authorities that there is no need of restating them here.
In Re Estate of Schumacher 39 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1949
In Re Estate of Schumacher 39 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1949
Tbe legal principles to be applied in determining whether the evidence sustains the court’s findings on the question of undue influence are so well stated and the authorities so well collected in In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , , that we see no need of restating them here.
Ryan v. Meehan 18 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1945
Ryan v. Meehan 18 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1945
See, In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , ; In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1 , 13 N. W. (2d) 765 .
Marsden v. Puck 13 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1944
In Re Estate of Marsden 13 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1944
Marsden v. Puck 13 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1944
& Supp. § 10238; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , ; In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , ; In re Estate of Geske, 211 Minn. 447 , 1 N. W. (2d) 423 ; Buck v. Buck, 122 Minn. 463 , ; In re Hollis’ Estate, 234 Iowa —, 12 N. W. (2d) 576 .
In Re Estate of Marsden 13 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1944
598 ; In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , ; In re Estate of Geske, 211 Minn. 447 , ; Buck v. Buck, 122 Minn. 463 , 142 N.W.
Lichtenberg v. Geske 1 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1941
In Re Estate of Geske 1 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1941
Lichtenberg v. Geske 1 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1941
In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, supra.
In Re Estate of Geske 1 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1941
In re Estate of Mazanec, 204 Minn. 406 , ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, supra .