Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tevoght v. Polson, 285 N.W. 893.

27 citing documents.

O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros. 549 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1996
Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co. 406 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1987
Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co. 406 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 1987
See, e.g., Urbanski v. Merchants Motor Freight, 239 Minn. 63, 71 , Tevoght v. Polson, 205 Minn. 252, 255 , 285 N.W.
Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co. 385 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schleicher v. Lunda Construction Co. 385 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Shiely Co., 234 Minn. 548 , Tevoght v. Polson, 205 Minn. 252 , 285 N.W.
Peterson v. Kludt 317 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1982
Peterson v. Kludt 317 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1982
See McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp., 253 Minn. 501, 504-06 , -56 (1958); Tevoght v. Polson, 205 Minn. 252, 253-54 , 285 N.W.
McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp. 93 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1958
McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp. 93 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1958
In considering the arguments of the defendant it is unnecessary to further discuss the history of § 176.061, as that subject is fully discussed in Tevoght v. Poison, 205 Minn. 252 , , and in Gleason v. Geary, 214 Minn. 499 , 8 N. W. (2d) 808 .
Urbanski v. Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. 57 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1953
Urbanski v. Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. 57 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1953
3 The Rasmussen decision stated the general rule that ( 168 Minn. 324 , ) : “* * * Business is related when the parties are mutually or reciprocally interested in a commercial way, or where the business of one has a necessary relation toward or in conjunction with the other.” The Rasmussen case was expressly limited and the McGrath case was impliedly limited by Tevoght v. Poison, 205 Minn. 252 , 285 * one of a line of cases which established' that one who merely supplies or delivers a product to
Swanson v. J. L. Shiely Co. 48 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1951
Swanson v. J. L. Shiely Co. 48 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1951
Gleason v. Geary, 214 Minn. 499, 506 , 8 N. W. (2d) 808, 812 ; Tevoght v. Poison, 205 Minn. 252 , .
Devere v. Parten 23 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1946
Devere v. Parten 23 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1946
§ 176.06 (1940 Supp. § 4275-5); Tevoght v. Polson, 205 Minn. 252 , .
Johnson v. City of Duluth 12 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1943
Johnson v. City of Duluth 12 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1943
In addition to the Anderson case, the court also cited, among others, the following: Tevoght v. Poison, 205 Minn. 252 , ; Gentle v. Northern States *195 Power Co. 213 Minn. 231 , 6 N. W. (2d) 361 ; Gleason v. Geary, 214 Minn. 499 , 8 N. W. (2d) 808 .
Gleason v. Geary 8 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1943
Gleason v. Geary 8 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1943
Again, in the later case of Tevoght v. Polson, 205 Minn. 252 , 255 , 285 N.W.
Gentle v. Northern States Power Co. 6 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1942
Gentle v. Northern States Power Co. 6 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1942
The argument as to the meaning of the statute has taken a wide range, but we do not deem it necessary to pursue all the arguments, because we have fully stated the history of the statute and settled its construction in such recent decisions as Tevoght v. Polson, 205 Minn. 252 , , which we followed in Smith v. Ostrov, 208 Minn. 77 , , and in Smith v. Kedney Warehouse Co. Inc. 197 Minn. 558 , , .
Smith v. Ostrov 292 N.W. 745 Minn. 1940
Smith v. Ostrov 292 N.W. 745 Minn. 1940
In light of our decision in the recent case of Tevoght v. Poison, 205 Minn. 252, 254 , , it cannot reasonably be argued that employers standing in such a relation to one another are engaged in a common enterprise or in the same or related purposes.
Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co. 289 N.W. 567 Minn. 1939
Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co. 289 N.W. 567 Minn. 1939
Tevoght v. Polson, 205 Minn. 252 , , is one of the latest decisions on this point and reviews many of its predecessors.
McGough v. McCarthy Improvement Co. 287 N.W. 857 Minn. 1939
McGough v. McCarthy Improvement Co. 287 N.W. 857 Minn. 1939
(The historic background in respect of § 4291 (1) is well stated in the recent case of Tevoght v. Polson, 205 Minn. 252 , 285 N.W.