DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jannetta v. Jannetta, 285 N.W. 619.

30 citing documents.

  • Criticized In re the Estate of Adolph J. Wagner, Deceased, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    We are not persuaded by Farm’s argument that the 1994 contract to will is “irrevocable”
  • Concordia College Corp. v. Salvation Army 470 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • Concordia College Corp. v. Salvation Army 470 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266, 269 , 285 N.W.
  • Clark v. Clark 288 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1979
  • Clark v. Clark 288 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1979
    In two prior cases, Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266 , 285 N.W.
  • Neff v. Poboisk 161 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 1968
  • Neff v. Poboisk 161 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 1968
    Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266, 269 , .
  • Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company 137 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1965
  • Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company 137 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1965
    12 See, Thermorama, Inc. v. Buckwold, 267 Minn. 551 , 125 N. W. (2d) 844 ; Cramond v. AFL-CIO, 267 Minn. 229 , 126 N. W. (2d) 252 ; Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266 , .
  • State Ex Rel. Clark v. Applebaums Food Markets, Inc. 106 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1960
  • Alsdorf v. Svoboda 57 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1953
  • Alsdorf v. Svoboda 57 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1953
    In re Estate of LeBorius, supra; Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266 , .
  • Zuelch v. Droege 56 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1953
  • Zuelch v. Droege 56 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1953
    McCarty v. Nelson, 233 Minn. 362 , 47 N. W. (2d) 595 , certiorari denied, 342 U. S. 887 , 72 S. Ct. 177 , 96 L. ed. 665; Carlson v. Carlson, 211 Minn. 297 , ; Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266 , ; Schoonover v. *312 Schoonover, 86 Kan.
  • McCarty v. Nelson 47 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1951
  • McCarty v. Nelson 47 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1951
    Carlson v. Carlson, 211 Minn. 297 , ; Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266 , ; Greenfield v. Peterson, 141 Minn. 475 , .
  • Steller v. Thomas 45 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1950
  • Steller v. Thomas 45 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1950
    Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266 , .
  • LeBorius v. Reynolds 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
  • In Re Estate of Leborius 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
  • LeBorius v. Reynolds 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
    “But to authorize a court to decree the specific performance of an oral contract to give property by will, the contract must appear reasonable, and be clearly and satisfactorily established; and it must also have been performed, on behalf of the beneficiary, to such extent and in such manner that he cannot be compensated properly in damages.” In Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266, 269, 270 , 622 , the court said : “A party may bind himself by contract to make a testamentary disposition of his p
  • In Re Estate of Leborius 28 N.W.2d 157 Minn. 1947
    In Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266 , 269 , 270 , 285 N.W.
  • Downing v. Maag 10 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1943
  • Downing v. Maag 10 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1943
    127 ; Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266 , 285 N.W.
  • Herman v. Kelehan 3 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1942
  • Herman v. Kelehan 3 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1942
    The judgment is affirmed with leave to either party to apply to the trial court for its correction in conformity with the opinion of this court in Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266, 271 , .
  • Dill v. Kucharsky 3 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1942
  • Dill v. Kucharsky 3 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1942
    The contention is that respondent’s evidence of the existence and terms of the oral agreement does not satisfy the quality of proof required—“clear, positive, and convincing.” Anderson v. Anderson, 197 Minn. 252, 254 , ; Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266, 269 , .
  • Carlson v. Carlson 300 N.W. 900 Minn. 1941
  • Carlson v. Carlson 300 N.W. 900 Minn. 1941
    “The contract must be proved by clear, positive, and convincing evidence.” Jannetta v. Jannetta, 205 Minn. 266, 269 , .