Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 289 N.W. 557.

87 citing documents.

Hoeft v. Hennepin County 754 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Hoeft v. Hennepin County 754 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., 206 Minn. 562, 566 , 289 N.W.
Texas Commerce Bank v. Olson 416 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Texas Commerce Bank v. Olson 416 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(presumption is not evidence); Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 206 Minn. 562, 566 , 289 N.W.
In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
See Ogren v. City of Duluth, 219 Minn. 555, 564 , Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 206 Minn. 562, 567 , 289 N.W.
Hanson v. Roe 373 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hanson v. Roe 373 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 206 Minn. 562, 567-68 , 289 N.W.
Buettner v. City of St. Cloud 277 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1979
Buettner v. City of St. Cloud 277 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1979
See, Ryan v. Metropolitan Insurance Company, 206 Minn. 562 , 289 N.W.
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
We decided in Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 206 Minn. 562 , 289 N.W.
Rohling v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company 243 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1976
Rohling v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company 243 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1976
Steinhaus v. Adamson 201 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1972
Steinhaus v. Adamson 201 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1972
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , but it is significant that no member of the court as it then existed concurred with this statement.
Jones v. Peterson 156 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1968
Jones v. Peterson 156 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1968
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , , contending that in this decision we committed ourselves to the Wigmore-Thayer theory that presumptions are merely procedural devices by which the responsibility for going forward with the evidence is placed on one party or another without affecting the ultimate incidence of the burden of proof.
Jensen v. City of Duluth 130 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1964
Jensen v. City of Duluth 130 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1964
Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc. 111 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1961
State v. Keaton 104 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1960
State v. Keaton 104 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1960
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , ; *364 Roeck v. Halvorson, 254 Minn. 394 , 95 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Lynghaug v. Payte, 247 Minn. 186 , 76 N. W. (2d) 660 , 56 A. L. R. (2d) 1090; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; Knuth v. Murphy, 237 Minn. 225 , 54 N. W. (2d) 771 .
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 103 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1960
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 103 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1960
State v. Higgin 99 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1959
State v. Higgin 99 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1959
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , , we have established the rule that presumptions are not of an evidentiary nature but a procedural device which shifts the burden of going forward with the evidence.
Roeck v. Halvorson 95 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1959
Roeck v. Halvorson 95 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1959
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , , we held that the presumption was of an evidentiary nature.
Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1956
Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1956
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , , and TePoel v. Larson, supra.
TePoel v. Larson 53 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1952
TePoel v. Larson 53 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1952
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , , after a rather exhaustive examination of our cases and other authorities, we adopted what is commonly known as the Thayer-Wigmore rule.
Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler 50 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1951
Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler 50 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1951
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , ; Ogren v. City of Duluth, 219 Minn. 555 , 18 N. W. (2d) 535 ; Donea v. Massachusetts Mut.
Suske v. Straka 39 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1949
Suske v. Straka 39 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1949
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , , which are collected in 2 Dunnell, Dig.
Ammundson v. Falk 36 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1949
Ammundson v. Falk 36 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1949
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , , an instruction that there is a presumption that decedent at the moment of death was in the exercise of due care should not be given in a civil case.
Koenigs v. Thome 31 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1948
Koenigs v. Thome 31 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1948
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , ; Donea v. Massachusetts Mut.
Johnson v. Munsingwear, Inc. 25 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1946
Johnson v. Munsingwear, Inc. 25 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1946
Donea v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. 19 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1945
Donea v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. 19 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1945
Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
State v. Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis 18 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1945
State v. Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis 18 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1945
Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 17 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1944