DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Pehrson, 287 N.W. 313.

46 citing documents.

  • Matter of Ultraflex Enterprises'appeal 497 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • Matter of Ultraflex Enterprises'appeal 497 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573, 577 , 287 N.W.
  • State v. Brown 345 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Brown 345 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1984
    See State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , 287 N.W.
  • State v. Witt 245 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Witt 245 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 1976
    See, State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573
  • Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State 229 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1975
  • Federal Distillers, Inc. v. State 229 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1975
    State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson, supra.
  • Johnson v. Donovan 188 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1971
  • Johnson v. Donovan 188 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1971
    For instance, in State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , , an ordinance exempting growers from a peddlers’ tax was held unconstitutional; State ex rel.
  • Schultz v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. 175 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1970
  • Schultz v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. 175 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1970
    This court has held in State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573, 577 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045: “* * * The fact that a statute discriminates in favor of a certain class does not make it arbitrary if the discrimination is founded upon a reasonable distinction or if any reasonable state of facts can be conceived to sustain it.
  • Scannell v. City of Saint Paul 163 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1969
  • Scannell v. City of Saint Paul 163 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1969
    The rules with respect to determining whether a classification sufficiently meets the tests required by our Constitution are adequately stated in State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045, and in Williams v. Rolfe, 262 Minn. 284 , 114 N. W. (2d) 671 .
  • Northern States Power Company v. Esperson 144 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1966
  • Northern States Power Company v. Esperson 144 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1966
    However, as was said in State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045, the rights of all persons must rest upon the same rule under similar circumstances; and where classification is adopted it must be based on some difference which bears a reasonable and just relation to the act in respect to which the classification is proposed.
  • Construction & General Laborers Union, Local 563 v. City of St. Paul 134 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1965
  • Construction & General Laborers Union, Local 563 v. City of St. Paul 134 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1965
    3 For other authorities on the issues involved, see Gray v. Building Trades Council, 91 Minn. 171 , , 63 L. R. A. 753; State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045; Fairview Hospital Assn. v. Public Bldg.
  • Fabio v. City of St. Paul 126 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1964
  • Fabio v. City of St. Paul 126 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1964
    6 State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573, 577 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045; Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Comm.
  • City of St. Paul v. Dalsin 71 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1955
  • City of St. Paul v. Dalsin 71 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1955
    16 State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045; Loew v. Hagerle Brothers, 226 Minn. 485 , 33 N. W. (2d) 598 .
  • State v. International Harvester Co. 63 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1954
  • State v. International Harvester Co. 63 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1954
    Co. 126 Minn. 286 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 412; Loew v. Hagerle Brothers, 226 Minn. 485 , 33 N. W. (2d) 598 ; State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. *375 573, , 123 A. L. R. 1045; Eldred v. Div. of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , ; Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co. 301 U. S. 495 , 57 S. Ct. 868 , 81 L. ed. 1245, 109 A. L. R. 1327; General Mills, Inc. v. Div. of Employment and Security, 224 Minn. 306 , 28 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State ex rel.
  • Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Commission 61 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1953
  • Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Commission 61 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1953
    Co. 126 Minn. 286 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 412; Loew v. Hagerle Brothers, 226 Minn. 485 , 33 N. W. (2d) 598 ; State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. *418 573 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045; Eldred v. Div. of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , ; Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co. 301 U. S. 495 , 57 S. Ct. 868 , 81 L. ed. 1245, 109 A. L. R. 1327; General Mills, Inc. v. Div. of Employment and Security, 224 Minn. 306 , 28 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State ex rel.
  • State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
  • Cleveland v. County of Rice 56 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1952
  • Cleveland v. County of Rice 56 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1952
    State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , 287 N.W.
  • State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
    972 ; State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , 287 N.W.
  • City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
  • City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
    The law relating to this subject is so well stated in State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573, 577 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045, where many of the cases are collected, that we need only repeat what was there said: “The general principles to be applied are well established.
  • George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson 34 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1948
  • George Benz Sons, Inc. v. Ericson 34 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1948
    State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , 577 , 287 N.W.
  • State v. Hokenson 300 N.W. 193 Minn. 1941
  • State v. Hokenson 300 N.W. 193 Minn. 1941
    d assignments may easily be disposed of since we have held in several cases that in criminal cases “a new trial will not be granted for refusal to dismiss when the state rested, if the evidence as finally in warrants the conviction.” State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Omodt, 198 Minn. 165, 170 , ; State v. Traver, 198 Minn. 237 , ; State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573, 575, 576 , , 123 A. L. R. 1015.
  • State v. Marcus 299 N.W. 241 Minn. 1941
  • State v. Marcus 299 N.W. 241 Minn. 1941
    The defendant places his greatest reliance on State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045, a prosecution for the violation of an ordinance of Minneapolis requiring a license fee from transient merchants engaged in selling certain farm products, and exempting from payment of the license those who sold products from land occupied and cultivated by them.
  • Burns v. City of St. Paul 297 N.W. 638 Minn. 1941
  • Burns v. City of St. Paul 297 N.W. 638 Minn. 1941
    The general principles underlying judicial consideration of class legislation Avere so fully expounded in State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045, that further exposition here seems unnecessary.
  • C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. Spaeth 297 N.W. 9 Minn. 1941
  • C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. Spaeth 297 N.W. 9 Minn. 1941
    Plaintiff contends that under State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , , and Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U. S. 404 , 56 S. Ct. 252 , 80 L. ed. 299, 102 A. L. R. 54, the classification here involved is invalid.
  • Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security 295 N.W. 412 Minn. 1940
  • Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security 295 N.W. 412 Minn. 1940
    In State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573, 577, 578 , , the principles to be applied in cases involving classification are cited.
  • Dimke v. Finke 295 N.W. 75 Minn. 1940
  • Dimke v. Finke 295 N.W. 75 Minn. 1940
    iscriminatory, but that it operate equally and uniformly upon all persons in similar circumstances, Reed v. Bjornson, supra; that it be reasonable and based upon *34 actual differences, Miller v. Wilson, 236 U. S. 373 , 35 S. Ct. 342 , 59 L. ed. 628, L. R. A. 1915F, 829; Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co. 301 U. S. 495 , 57 S. Ct. 868 , 81 L. ed. 1245, 109 A. L. R. 1327; State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. 573 , .