DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Holden v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 291 N.W. 104.

38 citing documents.

  • In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
    In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 216 , 291 N.W.
  • In Re Estate of King 668 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    A testator’s intention must “be ascertained from the language of his will, which may have a meaning controlled by surrounding circumstances or context.” In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 215 , 291 N.W.
  • In Re the Trust Created Under Agreement With Lane 660 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    A settlor’s “intention must be ascertained from the language of his will, which may have a meaning controlled by surrounding circumstances or context.” In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 215 , 291 N.W.
  • Webb Business Promotions, Inc. v. American Electronics & Entertainment Corp. 617 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 2000
    However, “[findings of fact which are controlled or influenced by error of law are not final on appeal and will be set aside.” In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , 291 N.W.
  • Maurer v. Maurer 607 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , 291 N.W.
  • Matter of Welfare of Mdo 450 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    “Findings of fact which are controlled or influenced by error of law are not final on appeal and will be set aside.” In re Trust of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , 291 N.W.
  • In Re Estate of Schroeder 441 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc., In Re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211 , 291 N.W.
  • Application of Northern States Power Co. 440 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , 291 N.W.
  • Chin v. Zoet 418 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    In re Trust Under the Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , 291 N.W.
  • Honn v. Coin & Stamp Gallery, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    In Re Trust of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , 291 N.W.
  • Holstein v. Commissioner of Public Safety 392 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211 , 227, 291 N.W.
  • Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211 , 291 N.W.
  • Knutson v. Primeau 371 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , 291 N.W.
  • Yliniemi v. Mausolf 371 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    In Re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , 291 N.W.
  • Toombs v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
    The first case in Minnesota to hold that “lawful issue” is a technical phrase designating a class to which adoptees belong was In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , 291 N.W.
  • In Re Trusts Created by Agreement With Harrington 250 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1977
  • In Re Trusts Created by Agreement With Harrington 250 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1977
    The first major case interpreting the statute was In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211
  • Lifson v. Commissioner of Taxation 195 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1972
    In re Trust under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211
  • In Re Estate of Murphy 269 Minn. 393 Minn. 1964
    [15] Cf. In re Trust under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , 291 N.W.
  • In Re Trust Under Agreement With Nash 122 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1963
    6 In the case of In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , , this court laid to rest the question of whether the word “issue” includes adopted children of a life tenant by holding that it did.
  • In Re Trust Created by Will of Patrick 106 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1960
    1171 ; In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , 291 N.W.
  • Patrick v. Northern City National Bank 106 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1960
    259.29; In re Estate of Youmans, 218 Minn. 172 , 15 N. W. (2d) 537 , 154 A. L. R. 1171; In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
  • Olson v. Olson 53 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1952
    In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , ; Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 .
  • In Re Trust Created by Moulton 233 Minn. 286 Minn. 1951
    In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , *290 215, 291 N.W.
  • Van Dyke v. First National Bank 46 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1951
    “* * * Absent tokens of meaning other than such as the language itself imports, intention must be found exclusively in the language.” In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, *290 215 , ; First & American Nat.
  • Lee v. Delmont 36 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1949
    In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , ; 3 Am.
  • Boyle v. Kirby 26 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 1947
    In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
  • In Re Trust Under Will of Davidson 26 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 1947
    In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , 291 N.W.
  • In Re Estate of Youmans 15 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1944
    While we held in Fiske v. Lawton, 124 Minn. 85 , , and In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , , that the child adopted in each of those cases outside the state was entitled to inherit and take under our statutes, neither case involved the point now under consideration.
  • Boutelle v. Renshaw 15 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1944
    Gf., for example, In re Estate of Norman, 209 Minn. 19, 26 , ; In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 218 , .
  • In Re Estate of Boutelle 15 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1944
    63 , 66 ; In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , 218 , 291 N.W.
  • Country Club District Service Co. v. Village of Edina 8 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1943
    In re Trust under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , .
  • State v. Tennyson 2 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1942
    In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
  • Larkin v. McCabe 299 N.W. 649 Minn. 1941
    In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
  • In Re Estate of Norman 295 N.W. 63 Minn. 1940
    In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , 216 , 291 N.W.
  • Olson v. Tubbs 295 N.W. 63 Minn. 1940
    “Technical words which have a definite and well understood meaning will be presumed to have been used in that sense in the absence of surrounding circumstances or context which show that a different meaning ivas intended.” In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 216 , .
  • First and American National Bank v. Higgins 293 N.W. 585 Minn. 1940
    In re Trust under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 218 , .
  • In Re Trust Under Will of Holden 291 N.W. 104 Minn. 1940