Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cole v. Healy, 293 N.W. 90.
-
Agner v. Bourn
161 N.W.2d 813
Minn. 1968
This court said in In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , : “The existence of undue influence in a particular case is to be determined by ascertaining the effect of the influence which was in fact exerted upon the mind of the testatrix, considering her physical and mental condition, the person by whom it was exerted, the time and place and all of the surroundi
-
Fenrick v. Olson
131 N.W.2d 235
Minn. 1964
ey were of such a character and were made under such circumstances that they were reasonably calculated to deceive the plaintiff * * *; and the diligence and prudence that is required is such as may reasonably be expected of a person of the intelligence and capacity of the person seeking the relief.” See, also, Leuba v. Bailey, 251 Minn. 193, 203 , 88 N. W. (2d) 73, 80 ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , .
-
Schwartz v. Wenger
124 N.W.2d 489
Minn. 1963
9 Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5, 12 , ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597, 603 , ; In re Estate of Cunningham, 219 Minn. 80, 85 , 17 N. W. (2d) 85, 88 ; State v. Garden, 267 Minn. 97 , 125 N. W. (2d) 591 .
-
In Re Estate of Anthony
265 Minn. 382
Minn. 1963
(2d) 429, 432 ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , 293 N.W.
-
Leuba v. Bailey
88 N.W.2d 73
Minn. 1957
In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , .
-
Sorlie v. Thomas
51 N.W.2d 592
Minn. 1952
In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597, 603 , .
-
Distinguished
In Re Estate of Schumacher
39 N.W.2d 604
Minn. 1949
The case is readily distinguishable from cases such as In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , , where the testator was a person of weakened mem tality and easily susceptible to the influence of others.
-
Hagerty v. Radle
37 N.W.2d 487
Minn. 1949
Peoples State Bank v. Drake-Ballard Co. 164 Minn. 175 , ; Ferraro v. Taylor, 197 Minn. 5 , ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , .
-
Olson v. Mork
35 N.W.2d 439
Minn. 1948
In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , ; Phipps v. Van Kleeck, 22 Hun (N. Y.) 541; Matter of Spratt, 11 Misc.
-
In Re Estate of Olson
35 N.W.2d 439
Minn. 1948
In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , 293 N.W.
-
Teschendorf v. Strangeway
27 N.W.2d 429
Minn. 1947
In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1 , 13 N. W. (2d) 765 ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
-
In Re Estate of Wilson
27 N.W.2d 429
Minn. 1947
In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1 , ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , 293 N.W.
-
Pogue v. Fegan
17 N.W.2d 85
Minn. 1944
* * * However, not having taken the stand, their conduct is not subject to the censure meted out in In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , , to an *86 attorney who assumed the dual role of witness and attorney and gave the controlling testimony in support of a will.” This court has in several instances called attention to the impropriety of counsel’s becoming a witness for his client in a case which he is trying.
-
In Re Estate of Cunningham
17 N.W.2d 85
Minn. 1944
* * * However, not having taken the stand, their conduct is not subject to the censure meted out in In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , 293 N.W.
-
Marsden v. Puck
13 N.W.2d 765
Minn. 1944
However, not having taken the stand, their conduct is not subject to the censure meted out in In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , , to an attorney who assumed the dual role of witness and attorney and gave the controlling testimony in support of a will.
-
In Re Estate of Marsden
13 N.W.2d 765
Minn. 1944
However, not having taken the stand, their conduct is not subject to the censure meted out in In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , 293 N.W.
-
Hafner v. Schmitz
9 N.W.2d 713
Minn. 1943
Claggett v. Claggett, 204 Minn. 568 , ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , ; Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy, 135 Minn. 262 , .