32,258.
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
State v. Mitchell
Cited by
- Richard L. Greenstreet v. Central Minnesota Educational Research & Development Council, Lowell ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- A22-0545 A22-0547 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Swenson v. Holsten 783 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Earth Protector, Inc. v. City of Hopkins 474 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Hanson v. Fergus Falls National Bank & Trust Co. 65 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1954
- State v. Bollenbach 63 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1954
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Minnesota Valley Gun Club v. Northline Corporation 290 N.W. 222
Opinion text
Per Curiam. Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct consisting of indecent exposure. He was found guilty. A recital of the facts would not be a benefit to the defendant or the bench and bar. It is sufficient to state that the question was essentially one of *56 identity of defendant as the guilty person. We have carefully read and considered the entire record and are satisfied that the lower court had a sufficient basis in the testimony to find that defendant was guilty. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.