DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Burke v. Burke, 292 N.W. 426.

25 citing documents.

  • Marriage of Sinsabaugh v. Heinerscheid 428 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Kendall v. Kendall 181 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1970
  • Kendall v. Kendall 181 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1970
    See, Spratt v. Spratt, 151 Minn. 458, 466 , , , 230; Eck v. Eck, 252 Minn. 290, 299 , 90 N. W. (2d) 211, 217 ; Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1, 3 , .
  • Bollenbach v. Bollenbach 175 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1970
  • Bollenbach v. Bollenbach 175 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1970
    18 Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1 , ; Eck v. Eck, 252 Minn. 290 , 90 N. W. (2d) 211 .
  • Borchert v. Borchert 154 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1967
  • Borchert v. Borchert 154 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1967
    Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1 , .
  • Ward v. Ward 114 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1962
  • Ward v. Ward 114 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1962
    3 Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594 ; Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1 , ; Spratt v. Spratt, 151 Minn. 458 , , .
  • Ruprecht v. Ruprecht 96 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1959
  • Ruprecht v. Ruprecht 96 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1959
    Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1, 5 , ; Hartigan v. Hartigan, 145 Minn. 27, 29 , ; 2 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Eck v. Eck 90 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1958
  • Eck v. Eck 90 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1958
    See, Spratt v. Spratt, 151 Minn. 458 , , ; Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1 , ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Baskerville v. Baskerville 75 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1956
  • Baskerville v. Baskerville 75 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1956
    24 Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1, 5 , ; Hartigan v. Hartigan, 145 Minn. 27, 29 , ; Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338 , 22 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Krusemark v. Krusemark 46 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1951
  • Krusemark v. Krusemark 46 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1951
    Webber v. Webber, 157 Minn. 422 , ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1 , .
  • Hempel v. Hempel 30 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1948
  • Hempel v. Hempel 30 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1948
    Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1 , .
  • Baker v. Baker 28 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1947
  • Baker v. Baker 28 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1947
    Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1, 5 , ; Hartigan v. Hartigan, 145 Minn. 27, 29 , ; 2 Dun-nell, Dig.
  • Louden v. Louden 22 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1946
  • Louden v. Louden 22 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1946
    Unlike the situation in Burke v. Burke, 208 Minn. 1 , , we do not here have an arbitrary time limitation, but, instead, a sliding scale whereby the alimony is to be reduced over a period of years from $50 to $30.
  • Weber v. McCarthy 7 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1943
  • Weber v. McCarthy 7 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1943
    Timm v. *81 Schneider, 208 Minn. 1, 8 , , and Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co. 214 Minn. 64 , 7 N. W. (2d) 684 .