Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co., 290 N.W. 802.

73 citing documents.

Minnesota Association of Public Schools v. Hanson 178 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1970
Minnesota Association of Public Schools v. Hanson 178 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1970
of Education v. Borgen, 192 Minn. 512 , ; Hassler v. Engberg, 233 Minn. 487 , 48 N. W. (2d) 343 ; Seiz v. Citizens Pure *419 Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , .
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
In Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277, 281 , , this court said: “Proceedings for a declaratory judgment must be based on an actual controversy.
Dakota County Members of the Bar v. Dakota County Officials 150 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1967
Dakota County Members of the Bar v. Dakota County Officials 150 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1967
‡ # # s|i s}: “Lawrence L. Lenertz Gerald W. Kalina” 6 See, also, Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , ; Hassler v. Engberg, 233 Minn. 487 , 48 N. W. (2d) 343 ; Minneapolis Federation of Men Teachers v. Board of Education, 238 Minn. 154 , 56 N. W. (2d) 203 ; Port Authority of City of St.
In RE CONDEMNATION BY OAK CENTER CREAMERY CO. v. Grobe 119 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1963
In RE CONDEMNATION BY OAK CENTER CREAMERY CO. v. Grobe 119 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1963
Co. 181 Minn. 573 , , this court held that jurisdiction on appeal cannot be conferred by consent of counsel or litigants, stating: “The duty is on appellant to make jurisdiction appear plainly and affirmatively from the printed record.” And in Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , , this court held in a declaratory judgment action: “A proceeding for a declaratory judgment must be based on a justiciable controversy for lack of which the appellate court will reverse for want of jurisdictio
Harrington v. Fairchild 51 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 1952
Harrington v. Fairchild 51 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 1952
In Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , , the case was dismissed because the complaint demanded an advisory opinion as to the plaintiff’s right to benefits if he should, in the future, and upon the occurrence of certain events, become unemployed.
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544; County Board of Education v. Borgen, 192 Minn. 512 , ; Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , .
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Haveland 25 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1946
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Haveland 25 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1946
In Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277, 281 , , this court held: “Proceedings for a declaratory judgment must be based on an actual controversy.
State Ex Rel. Ashcroft v. Jensen 7 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1943
County of Aitkin v. City of Minneapolis 211 Minn. 223 Minn. 1941
In Re Settlement of Robinette 300 N.W. 798 Minn. 1941
County of Aitkin v. City of Minneapolis 211 Minn. 223 Minn. 1941
Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , ; County Board of Education v. Borgen, 192 Minn. 512 , ; Keith v. Levi (C. C.) 2 F. 743 .
In Re Settlement of Robinette 300 N.W. 798 Minn. 1941
Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , 290 N.W.
State v. Yurkiewicz 292 N.W. 782 Minn. 1940
State v. Yurkiewicz 292 N.W. 782 Minn. 1940
See Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , .
McElhone v. Geror 292 N.W. 414 Minn. 1940
McElhone v. Geror 292 N.W. 414 Minn. 1940
Even in an action for declaratory judgment, we decline decision of a question of constitutionality unless and until we are sure that it is properly presented in a “justiciable controversy.” Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co. 207 Minn. 277 , .