Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 296 N.W. 911.

25 citing documents.

Pamela Maslowski, Minn. 2023
Co. v. Lorentz, 296 N.W. 911, 914 (Minn. 1941).
Barton v. Moore 558 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1997
Barton v. Moore 558 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1997
Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278 , 296 N.W.
In Re Estate of Fauskee 497 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re Estate of Fauskee 497 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278, 287 , 296 N.W.
Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Stillwater v. Baker 374 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Stillwater v. Baker 374 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278, 287 , 296 N.W.
Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. Taylor 368 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1985
Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. Taylor 368 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1985
Rathbun, 300 Minn. at 236 , d at 650 ; Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278, 287 , 296 N.W.
Phalen Park State Bank v. Reeves 251 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1977
Phalen Park State Bank v. Reeves 251 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1977
Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278
Rathbun v. WT Grant Company 219 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1974
Rathbun v. WT Grant Company 219 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1974
Citing Patterson v. Wyman, 142 Minn. 70 , and Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278 , the trial court stated that where the parties intentionally allow for a greater interest than the law allows, the law conclusively presumes that they intended the necessary consequence of their act.
Schauman v. Solmica Midwest, Inc. 168 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1969
Schauman v. Solmica Midwest, Inc. 168 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1969
1 Minnesota cases cited in Annotation, 14 A. L. R. (3d) 1065, 1079, as following the above rule are Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp. supra; Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278 , ; Seebold v. Eustermann, 216 Minn. 566 , 13 N. W. (2d) 739 , 152 A. L. R. 585; Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc. 254 Minn. 62 , 93 N. W. (2d) 690 .
Melbo v. Rinn 157 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1968
Melbo v. Rinn 157 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1968
Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278 , ; Seebold v. Eustermann, 216 Minn. 566 , 13 N. W. (2d) 739 , 152 A. L. R. 585.
Marquette Appliances, Inc. v. Economy Food Plan, Inc. 97 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1959
Marquette Appliances, Inc. v. Economy Food Plan, Inc. 97 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1959
See, Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278 , ; Kavli v. Leifman, 207 Minn. 549 , ; Hafiz v. Midland Loan Finance Co. 206 Minn. 76 , .
Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc. 93 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1958
Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc. 93 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1958
The Dunn case has been distinguished in Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278 , , and Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Madsen, 217 Minn. 267 , 14 N. W. (2d) 475 .
Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Madsen 14 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1944
Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Madsen 14 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1944
*274 On appeal therein (Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278 , ), the trial court’s determination was affirmed.
Seebold v. Eustermann 13 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1944
Seebold v. Eustermann 13 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1944
Since Lukens v. Hazlett, 37 Minn. 441 , ; Halos v. Nachbar, 196 Minn. 387 , ; and Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Lorentz, 209 Minn. 278 , , are said to support plaintiff’s position, a brief review of what these cases hold seems desirable.