DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32, 297 N.W. 4.

33 citing documents.

  • Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp. 424 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1988
  • Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp. 424 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1988
    ment.” In so doing, it relied upon two cases decided more than 45 years ago at a time when the predecessor to the present Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (the Industrial Commission) could independently find facts when this court would rarely disturb those findings, 9 and when the courts applied the “rule of liberal construction”: Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32, 209 Minn. 289 , 297 N.W.
  • Engel v. Starry 128 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1964
  • Engel v. Starry 128 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1964
    Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , .
  • Nelson v. City of St. Paul 81 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 1957
  • Nelson v. City of St. Paul 81 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 1957
    2 Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co. 209 Minn. 596 , ; Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , ; Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. & A. M. 226 Minn. 141 , 32 N. W. (2d) 255 .
  • Chillstrom v. Trojan Seed Co. 65 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1954
  • Chillstrom v. Trojan Seed Co. 65 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1954
    8 Bushnell v. City of Duluth, 241 Minn. 189 , 62 N. W. (2d) 813 ; Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 224 Minn. 395 , 29 N. W. (2d) 8 ; Elsenpeter v. Potvin, 213 Minn. 129 , 5 N. W. (2d) 499 ; Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , ; Anderson v. Russell Miller Milling Co. 196 Minn. 358 , ; Anderson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. 190 Minn. 125 , ; Bliss v. Swift & Co. 189 Minn. 210 , ; Cooper v. Mitchell, 188 Minn. 560 , ; Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co. 167 Minn. 475
  • Bushnell v. City of Duluth 62 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1954
  • Bushnell v. City of Duluth 62 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1954
    McDaniel v. City of Benson, 167 Minn. 407 , ; Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co. 167 Minn. 475 , ; Cooper v. Mitchell, 188 Minn. 560 , ; Bliss v. Swift & Co. 189 Minn. 210 , ; Anderson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. 190 Minn. 125 , ; Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , .
  • Johnson v. Giese 42 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1950
  • Johnson v. Giese 42 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1950
    As was said in Froslee v. Sonju, 209 Minn. 526 , , “No estoppel arises where the conduct of the party sought to be estopped is due to ignorance founded upon an innocent mistake.” Schaefer v. Nylin, 162 Minn. 170 , .
  • Breimhorst v. Beckman 35 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1949
  • Breimhorst v. Beckman 35 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1949
    In Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , , and Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co. 209 Minn. 596 , , the injuries were held to arise out of the employment although they were inflicted by the criminal acts of third parties.
  • Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M. 32 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1948
  • Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M. 32 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1948
    Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co. 209 Minn. 596 , ; Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , ; Simonson v. Knight, 174 Minn 491, .
  • Kennedy v. Thompson Lumber Co. 26 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1947
  • Kennedy v. Thompson Lumber Co. 26 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1947
    In Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , , there was an award to the employe’s widow where the employe, after his return from a labor union meeting which he had attended in his capacity as a labor union organizer, was found dead from a gunshot wound 80 feet from the garage of his home.
  • Callaghan v. Brown 16 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1944
  • Callaghan v. Brown 16 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1944
    In Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289, 292 , , this court adhered to the rule previously announced in Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 158 Minn. 495, 498 , , and prior cases, that an injury “may be received fin the course of the employment’ and still have no causal connection with it,” and in order to arise out of the
  • Brusven v. Ballord 14 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1944
  • Brusven v. Ballord 14 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1944
    “When a workman is injured while doing a thing outside and unconnected with what he is employed to do he is not under the protection of the act.” See Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , ; Kaselnak v. Fruit Dispatch, 205 Minn. 198 , .
  • Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co. 9 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1943
  • Fjellman v. Weller 7 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1942
  • Fjellman v. Weller 7 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1942
    It is only when a witness attempts to prove the truth of a given proposition by repeating what another said that his testimony is deemed hearsay.” Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289, 296 , ; 6 Wigmore, Evidence (3 ed.) § 1766.
  • Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 6 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1942
  • Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 6 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1942
    Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289, 292, 293 , .
  • Brown v. General Drivers Union No. 544 3 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1942
  • Brown v. General Drivers Union No. 544 3 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1942
    There is now no occasion to add anything to what is meant or intended by the quoted clause that is found in the following of our recent decisions: Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co. 209 Minn. 596 , ; Corcoran v. Teamsters *267 & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , ; Lindell v. Minnesota Am.
  • Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co. 297 N.W. 19 Minn. 1941
  • Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co. 297 N.W. 19 Minn. 1941
    Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , State ex rel.
  • Stenberg v. Raymond Co-Operative Creamery 296 N.W. 498 Minn. 1941
  • Stenberg v. Raymond Co-Operative Creamery 296 N.W. 498 Minn. 1941
    Aeden’s Church, 122 Conn. 343 , 189 A. 599 ; In re Connelly v. Samaritan Hospital, 259 N. T. 137, 181 N. E. 76 ; Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council, 209 Minn. 289 , ; State ex rel.