DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Klingman v. Loew's Incorporated, 296 N.W. 528.

26 citing documents.

  • George v. Marvin L. George Builders, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1969
  • George v. Marvin L. George Builders, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 1969
    6 See, Hierl v. McClure, 238 Minn. 335 , 56 N. W. (2d) 721 ; Klingman v. Loew’s Inc. 209 Minn. 449 , ; McManus v. Nichols-Chisholm Lbr.
  • Kvanli v. Village of Watson 139 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1965
  • Kvanli v. Village of Watson 139 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1965
    6 Compare Klingman v. Loew’s Incorporated, 209 Minn. 449 , , with Williams v. Jayne, 210 Minn. 594 , .
  • Tanski v. Jackson 130 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1964
  • Tanski v. Jackson 130 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1964
    Olson v. Buskey, 220 Minn. 155, 164 , 19 N. W. (2d) 57, 61 ; Klingman v. Loew’s Inc. 209 Minn. 449, 455 , ; Rule 43.06, Rules of Civil Procedure.
  • Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co. 95 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1959
  • Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co. 95 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1959
    Jur., Negligence, § 303; Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 173 Minn. 215, 217 , ; Klingman v. Loew’s Inc. 209 Minn. 449 , ; Cullen v. Pearson, 191 Minn. 136 , , ; Anderson v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co. 197 Minn. 144 , ; Johnson v. Bosch, 178 Minn. 363 , .
  • Erickson v. Paulson 87 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1957
  • Distinguished Erickson v. Paulson 87 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1957
    The case is distinguishable from State v. Saporen, 205 Minn. 358 , , and Klingman v. Loew’s Inc. 209 Minn. 449 , , where testimony relative to declarations was received in evidence for impeachment purposes over strenuous objection by opposing counsel and where it was held that an instruction such as that just described should therefore have been given, or was proper.
  • State Ex Rel. Clark v. Wolkoff 85 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1957
  • State Ex Rel. Clark v. Wolkoff 85 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1957
    14 Klingman v. Loew’s Inc. 209 Minn. 449 , ; see, 19 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
  • Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
    Cameron v. Evans, supra; Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 ; Klingman v. Loew’s Inc. 209 Minn. 449 , ; Sankiewicz v. Speckel, 209 Minn. 528 , ; Kivak v. G. N. Ry.
  • Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
  • Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
    5 Kapla v. Lehti, 225 Minn. 325 , 30 N. W. (2d) 685 ; Klingman v. Loew’s Incorporated, 209 Minn. 449 , ; Sankiewicz v. Speckel, 209 Minn. 528 , ; Kivak v. G. N. Ry.
  • In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
  • Olson v. Mork 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
  • Olson v. Mork 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
    Klingman v. Loew’s Inc. 209 Minn. 449 , ; Pullen v. C. M. St.
  • In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
    Klingman v. Loew's Inc. 209 Minn. 449 , 296 N.W.
  • Fandel v. Parish of St. John the Evangelist 29 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 1947
  • Fandel v. Parish of St. John the Evangelist 29 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 1947
    In Klingman v. Loew’s Incorporated, 209 Minn. 449, 454 , , this court used the *80 following quotation in stating that the substance of the rule in this state— “ ‘asserts that whenever a thing which produced an injury is shown to have been under the control and management of the defendant, and the occurrence is such as in the ordinary course of eve
  • White v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 11 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
  • White v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 11 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
    The background of the res ipsa loquitur rule is deemed adequately stated and discussed in Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 173 Minn. 215 , ; Cullen v. Pearson, 191 Minn. 136 , , ; Klingman v. Loew’s Incorporated, 209 Minn. 449 , .
  • Sankiewicz v. Speckel 296 N.W. 909 Minn. 1941
  • Sankiewicz v. Speckel 296 N.W. 909 Minn. 1941
    (2 ed. & 1932 Supp.) § 10343a, and cases cited; Klingman v. Loew’s Inc. 209 Minn. 449 , .