Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Doyen v. Bauer, 300 N.W. 451.
- Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC 771 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2009
-
Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC
771 N.W.2d 14
Minn. 2009
Based on this duty, Kratzer contends that Rand was obligated under the common law to communicate to John Hancock “ ‘all facts of which he has knowledge which might affect his principal’s rights or interests.’ ” Magee v. Odden, 220 Minn. 498, 508 , (quoting Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140, 145 , 300 N.W.
- Dahl v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. 545 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1996
-
Dahl v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
545 N.W.2d 918
Minn. 1996
Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , 300 N.W.
- Real Estate Dynamics, Inc. v. Richards 392 N.W.2d 250 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Real Estate Dynamics, Inc. v. Richards
392 N.W.2d 250
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
This rule, “which is based on considerations of common sense and honesty to prevent agents from compromising their principal's rights and interests in favor of their own and to remove the temptation of agents to be disloyal to their principals, is enforced rigorously as a matter of public policy.” Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140, 145-46 , 300 N.W.
- Handy v. Garmaker 324 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1982
-
Handy v. Garmaker
324 N.W.2d 168
Minn. 1982
Anderson v. Anderson, 293 Minn. 209 , Tarnowski v. Resop, 236 Minn. 33 , Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , 300 N.W.
- Village of Burnsville v. WESTWOOD COMPANY 189 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 1971
-
Village of Burnsville v. WESTWOOD COMPANY
189 N.W.2d 392
Minn. 1971
Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , ; Bentson v. Ellenstein, 215 Minn. 376 , 10 N. W. (2d) 282 .
- Transport Indemnity Co. v. Dahlen Transport, Inc. 161 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1968
-
Transport Indemnity Co. v. Dahlen Transport, Inc.
161 N.W.2d 546
Minn. 1968
4 See, for example, Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , ; 3 C. J. S., Agency, § 320(g); 3 Am.
- Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell 94 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1959
-
Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. Campbell
94 N.W.2d 273
Minn. 1959
Also see, Norby v. Security State Bank, 177 Minn. 127 , ; Bentson v. Ellenstein, 215 Minn. 376 , 10 N. W. (2d) 282 ; Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , ; Whitten v. Wright, 206 Minn. 423 , ; Olive v. Taylor, 182 Minn. 327 , ; Sorenson v. Greysolon Co. 170 Minn. 259 , ; Erickson v. Frazier, 169 Minn. 118 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
- Tarnowski v. Resop 51 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1952
-
Tarnowski v. Resop
51 N.W.2d 801
Minn. 1952
842; Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , ; Magee v. Odden, 220 Minn. 498 , 20 N. W. (2d) 87 .
- Lovel v. Squirt Bottling Co. of Waconia, Inc. 48 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1951
-
Lovel v. Squirt Bottling Co. of Waconia, Inc.
48 N.W.2d 525
Minn. 1951
Lowen v. Pates, 219 Minn. 566 , 18 N. W. (2d) 455 , supra (written admission); Litman v. Peper, 214 Minn. 127 , 7 N. W. (2d) 334 , supra; Schmitt v. Emery, 211 Minn. 547 , 2 N. W. (2d) 413 , 139 A. L. R. 1242; Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , ; Williams v. Jayne, 210 Minn. 594 , , supra; Quickstad v. Tavenner, 196 Minn. 125 , ; Guile v. Greenberg, 192 Minn. 548 , ; Thorkeldson v. Nicholson, 145 Minn. 491 , , supra; McManus v. Nichols-Chisholm Lbr.
- Magee v. Odden 20 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1945
-
Magee v. Odden
20 N.W.2d 87
Minn. 1945
As we recently said in Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140, 145 , , 454: “An agent is bound to act solely for the benefit of the principal in all matters connected with the agency.
- Diedrick v. Helm 14 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1944
-
Diedrick v. Helm
14 N.W.2d 913
Minn. 1944
Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , ; Schick v. Suttle, 94 Minn. 135 , .
- Cargill, Inc. v. Spaeth 10 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1943
-
Cargill, Inc. v. Spaeth
10 N.W.2d 728
Minn. 1943
Litman v. Peper, 214 Minn. 127 , 7 N. W. (2d) 334 ; Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , .
- Aide v. Taylor 7 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1943
-
Aide v. Taylor
7 N.W.2d 757
Minn. 1943
Litman v. Peper, 214 Minn. 127 , 7 N. W. (2d) 334 ; Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , .
- Kohanik v. Beckman 2 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1942
-
Kohanik v. Beckman
2 N.W.2d 125
Minn. 1942
Dawson v. Thuet Brothers, 147 Minn. 429 , ; Humphrey v. Sievers, 137 Minn. 373 , ; Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140, 148 , .
- Schmitt v. Emery 2 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1942
-
Schmitt v. Emery
2 N.W.2d 413
Minn. 1942
Doyen v. Bauer, 211 Minn. 140 , .