Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brulla v. Cassady, 289 N.W. 404.

46 citing documents.

Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 418 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
Reedon of Faribault, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. 418 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
No. 622, Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , 289 N.W.
Johnson v. Moore 146 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1966
Johnson v. Moore 146 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1966
See, Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .
Carlson v. Rand 146 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1966
Carlson v. Rand 146 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1966
In Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398, 403 , , we stated the rule to be: “A verdict may be directed only in those unequivocal cases where it clearly appears to the court on the trial that it would be its manifest duty to set aside a contrary verdict as not justified by the evidence or as contrary to the law applicable to the case.
Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
Co. 209 Minn. 230 , ; Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .
McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , ; Kundiger v. Prudential Ins.
Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , ; Mardorf v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 194 Minn. 537 , ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 233 Minn. 171 , 46 N. W. (2d) 243 ; Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , ; Thompson v. Pioneer-Press Co. 37 Minn. 285 , ; Kingsley v. Alden, 193 Minn. 503 , .
Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co. 61 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1953
Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co. 61 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1953
6 Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , ; Osborn v. Will, 183 Minn. 205 , .
Price v. Mackner 58 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1953
Price v. Mackner 58 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1953
Cofran v. Swanman, 225 Minn. 40 , 29 N. W. (2d) 448 ; Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .
LaCombe v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 51 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1952
LaCombe v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 51 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1952
Johnson v. Evanski, 221 Minn. 323 , 22 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Cofran v. Swanman, 225 Minn. 40 , 29 N. W. (2d) 448 ; Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , ; Mardorf v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 194 Minn. 537 , ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Paskewitz 47 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1951
State v. Paskewitz 47 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1951
Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , ; Spensley v. Oliver I. Min.
Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 46 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1951
Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 46 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1951
Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .” An extreme case was there described as one where the testimony of a witness is absolutely impossible either physically or morally; or where the evidence presented by a party is so unreasonable and inconsistent and so opposed by undisputed and independent evidence as to be wholly incredible and unwor
Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America 45 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1951
Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America 45 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1951
Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .
Cofran v. Swanman 29 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1947
Cofran v. Swanman 29 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1947
Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , ; Mardorf v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 194 Minn. 537 , ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
Sutton v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. 23 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1946
Sutton v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. 23 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1946
Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .
Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 17 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1944
Wilson v. Davidson 17 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1944
Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 17 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1944
Defendant urges, however, that this case is governed by Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398, 404 , , in which we said: “* * * Though the evidence on the part of the plaintiff standing alone • would justify submitting a case to the jury, yet the court should direct' a verdict for the defendant if, upon all the evidence, it would be its manifest duty to set aside a verdict against him.
Wilson v. Davidson 17 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1944
Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .
Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1944
Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1944
Co. 216 Minn. 451 , 13 N. W. (2d) 425 ; Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , , and similar cases.
Sviggum v. Phillips 15 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1944
Sviggum v. Phillips 15 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1944
We think that the facts here do not bring the case within the rule of Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 898 , , relied upon by defendant, to the effect that, even though there may be some evidence in favor of the adverse party, a verdict should be directed for the party in whose favor the evidence overwhelmingly predominates.
Spensley v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 13 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1944
Reiter v. Porter 13 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1944
Reiter v. Porter 13 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1944
In Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398, 404 , , we quoted Avith approval the statement found in 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Spensley v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 13 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1944
This rule is expressed in Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398, 403 , , wherein the court stated: “We cannot accept plaintiff’s suggestion that all of defendants’ testimony should be discarded.
Applequist v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 296 N.W. 13 Minn. 1941
Applequist v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 296 N.W. 13 Minn. 1941
Or, as said in Thompson v. Pioneer-Press Co. 37 Minn. 285, 289 , , whether the testimony for plaintiff is so “entirely unworthy of credit” that it “should not be accepted by any court or jury as the basis for a verdict.” The same thought was recently restated in Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398, 410 , , in which we quoted with approval from Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Chamberlain, 288 U. S. 333, 343 , 53 S. Ct. 391, 395 , 77 L. ed. 819, 824, that “where the evidence is ‘so overwhelmingly on one side
Fickling v. Nassif 294 N.W. 848 Minn. 1940
Fickling v. Nassif 294 N.W. 848 Minn. 1940
Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by