DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Linder v. Foster, 295 N.W. 299.

41 citing documents.

  • Seven Acquisition LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    This is because “the immunity rule is not to be ‘scuttled’ by pleadings which allege that the wrongful acts resulted from a conspiracy.” –91 (Minn. 1966) ().
  • William Salgat, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    See, (court- appointed therapist protected by quasi-judicial immunity); (court-appointed guardian ad litem immune from negligence claim for actions performed within the scope of their duties); (court-appointed physician immune from suit).
  • Terance Simmons, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    Judicial immunity provides that a judge cannot be held liable in a civil action for their “judicial acts, however erroneous, or by whatever motives prompted.”
  • Willow Run Partners, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
  • Steven Dahl, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    “Judicial immunity precludes judges from being held liable for ‘acts done in the exercise of judicial authority.’” ().
  • Nathan Kariniemi v. City of Rockford 882 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 2016
  • Nathan Kariniemi v. City of Rockford 882 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 2016
    Id.; Janklow, d at 716 (“Government officials are accorded near complete immunity for their actions in the course of their official duties, so long as they do not exceed the discretion granted them by law.”).10 9 E.g., Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 47-48, 295 N.W.
  • Marcia Lee Stresemann, d/b/a Affiliated Counseling Center, LLC v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human … 868 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2015
  • Marcia Lee Stresemann, d/b/a Affiliated Counseling Center, LLC v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human … 868 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2015
    Absolute immunity provides a recipient with a “total shield from liability,” Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 813 (1982), such that the recipient is immune from suit.5 See Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 48, 295 N.W.
  • Peterka v. Dennis 764 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 2009
  • Peterka v. Dennis 764 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 2009
    rom suits by third parties so long as he acts as a quasi-judicial officer, determining his obligations to the public and to his client); Robinette v. Price, 214 Minn. 521, 533 , (duties of county welfare board involved “inquiry of fact and the exercise of judgment based on such inquiry” and were therefore “not ministerial, but quasi judicial in nature”); Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 48 , 295 N.W.
  • Peterka v. Dennis 744 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • Peterka v. Dennis 744 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    This immunity applies to all determinations and acts made in a judicial capacity, “however erroneous or by whatever motives prompted.” Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 45 , 295 N.W.
  • Johnson v. State 536 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Johnson v. State 536 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    The doctrine has provided immunity to quasi-judicial officers or participants in the judicial system such as public defenders (Dziubak), guardians ad litem (), and court-appointed physicians and psychiatrists (Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 48 , 295 N.W.
  • Villarreal v. Independent School District 659 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • Villarreal v. Independent School District 659 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    ANALYSIS I Judicial immunity shields judges from liability for “acts done in the exercise of judicial authority.” Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 45 , 295 N.W.
  • Dziubak v. Mott 503 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1993
  • Dziubak v. Mott 503 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1993
    See, Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43 , 295 N.W.
  • Koelln v. Nexus Residential Treatment Facility 494 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • Koelln v. Nexus Residential Treatment Facility 494 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 45 , 295 N.W.
  • Myers Through Myers v. Price 463 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • Myers Through Myers v. Price 463 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    I. A judge or judicial officer cannot be held liable to anyone in a civil action for “acts done in the exercise of judicial authority.” Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 45 , 295 N.W.
  • Sloper v. Dodge 426 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Sloper v. Dodge 426 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    ANALYSIS Judicial immunity precludes judges from being held liable for “acts done in the exercise of judicial authority.” Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 45 , 295 N.W.
  • Brown v. Dayton Hudson Corp. 314 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1981
  • Brown v. Dayton Hudson Corp. 314 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 1981
    Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43 , 295 N.W.
  • Papenhausen v. Schoen 268 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1978
  • Papenhausen v. Schoen 268 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1978
    See, Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43 , 295 N.W.
  • Peterson v. Knutson 233 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1975
  • Peterson v. Knutson 233 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1975
    720 (S.D.Ala.1965); Hoppe v. Klapperich, 224 Minn. 224 , Payne v. Lee, supra ; Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43 , 295 N.W.
  • Jenson v. Olson 141 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1966
  • Jenson v. Olson 141 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1966
    We doubt whether that issue was properly raised by the pleadings but nevertheless call attention to Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 48 , , and Hoppe v. Klapperich, 224 Minn. 224, 234 , 28 N. W. (2d) 780, 788 , 173 A. L. R. 819, which dispose of this contention.
  • Henry v. Albert 129 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1964
  • Henry v. Albert 129 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1964
    [Cases cited.]” See, also, Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43 , , for statement of the immunity rule.
  • Gammel v. Ernst & Ernst 72 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1955
  • Gammel v. Ernst & Ernst 72 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1955
    * * * to grand and petit jurors in the discharge of their duties, * * * to assessors upon whom is imposed the duty of valuing property for the purpose of levying taxes, * * * to commissioners appointed to appraise damages when property is taken under the right of eminent domain, * * * to prosecuting attorneys” (Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 47 , ); to persons designated to act as arbitrators (Melady v. South St.
  • Dunn v. Schmid 60 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1953
  • Overruled Dunn v. Schmid 60 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1953
    As to the liability of administrative and judicial officers for tort generally, see Jennings, Tort Liability of Administrative Officers, 21 Minn. L. Rev. 263 ; Davis, Administrative Law, § 231; Wilbrecht v. Babcock, 179 Minn. 263 , ; Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345, 348 , , 40 A. L. R. 36 (dicta in two foregoing cases); Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43 , , wherein Stewart v. Cooley, 23 Minn. 347 , 23 Am.
  • Hoppe v. Klapperich 28 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1947
  • Hoppe v. Klapperich 28 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1947
    See, Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43, 46 , , and the *234 authorities therein cited.