Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bulau v. Bulau, 294 N.W. 845.

47 citing documents.

Pauline Sellner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
for the proposition that appellate jurisdiction cannot be conferred by the consent of the parties.
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Bulara v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 531 , 294 N.W.
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1995
Lerdal v. Fotioo 533 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1995
Lerdal v. Fotioo 533 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1995
Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , 294 N.W.
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 533 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1995
Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , 294 N.W.
City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 533 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1995
City of Shorewood v. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 533 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1995
Fifty-five years ago, in Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , 294 N.W.
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v. H & W Motor Express Co. 507 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v. H & W Motor Express Co. 507 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 530 , 294 N.W.
Blaine v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 498 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Blaine v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 498 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , 294 N.W.
Johnson v. Sel-Mor Distributing Co., Inc. 430 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Sel-Mor Distributing Co., Inc. 430 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 530 , 294 N.W.
Dahlgren v. Caring & Sharing, Inc. 429 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Dahlgren v. Caring & Sharing, Inc. 429 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 530 , 294 N.W.
Graupmann v. Rental Equipment & Sales Co. 425 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Graupmann v. Rental Equipment & Sales Co. 425 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Id.; see Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 530 , 294 N.W.
Schuck v. Champs Food Systems, Ltd. 424 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Schuck v. Champs Food Systems, Ltd. 424 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 530 , 294 N.W.
In Re Estate of Molden 396 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Estate of Molden 396 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 532 , 294 N.W.
Matter of Estate of Hoppke 388 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Matter of Estate of Hoppke 388 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , 294 N.W.
Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. Levine 366 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. Levine 366 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Generally, “an order of dismissal is but an order upon which judgment may be entered, and [the] appeal should be from the judgment.” Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 530 , 294 N.W.
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority 151 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1967
See, Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , .
Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 147 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1966
Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 147 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1966
In Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529, 532 , , after holding an order dismissing a cause for want of jurisdiction appeal-able, we said: “* * * An order affecting a substantial right, and appealable, made *370 in determining a motion after a full hearing has been had on a controverted question of fact and deciding a point actually litiga
Erickson v. Nelson 146 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1966
Erickson v. Nelson 146 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1966
Unlike a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, as in Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , , or a dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, equivalent to an order sustaining the old demurrer, as in Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 243 Minn. 30 , 66 N. W. (2d) 5 , the dismissal here requires the entry of judgment to become a final determination of the court.
Gollner v. Cram 102 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1960
Gollner v. Cram 102 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1960
L. Rev. 1 , 18, et seq.; cf. Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , ; Muellenberg v. Joblinski, 188 Minn. 398 , .
Luethi v. Stanko 61 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1953
Luethi v. Stanko 61 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1953
Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , ; State, by Peterson, v. Bentley, 224 Minn. 244 , 28 N. W. (2d) 179, 770 .
Ullman v. Lutz 55 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1952
Co. 181 Minn. 573 , ; Costello v. Dallman, 184 Minn. 49 , ; Geddes v. Broman, 208 Minn. 609 , .
State v. Sax 42 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1950
Anderson v. Lyons 32 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1948
Anderson v. Lyons 32 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1948
Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , .
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Bentley 28 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1947
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Bentley 28 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1947
Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , 294 N.W.
Marshfield Brewing Co. v. Schmidler 22 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1946
Marshfield Brewing Co. v. Schmidler 22 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1946
Bulau v. Bulau, 208 Minn. 529 , ; Kraus v. National Bank of Commerce, 140 Minn. 108 , ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
State Ex Rel. Ashcroft v. Jensen 7 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1943
Geddes v. Broman 295 N.W. 513 Minn. 1941
On authority of Johnson v. Union Savings B. & T. Co. 193 Minn. 357 , , the appeal was dismissed, Geddes v. Broman, 208 Minn. 609 , , and from the bench the attorneys were informed that if an appeal from the judgment was perfected in time they might submit such an appeal upon the record and arguments had.