DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co., 299 N.W. 196.

28 citing documents.

  • DeWitt v. Schuhbauer 177 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1970
  • DeWitt v. Schuhbauer 177 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1970
    Co. 210 Minn. 456, 459 , , where darkness had set in and confusion was probably caused by headlights, that a jury “could reasonably infer a lack of negligence” on the driver’s part, “[b] linded as he probably was by the headlights of defendant’s truck.” Surely, the facts now before the court created a jury issue on t
  • Zylka v. Leikvoll 144 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1966
  • Zylka v. Leikvoll 144 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1966
    Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456, 458 , .
  • Jensen v. City of Duluth 130 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1964
  • Henjum v. Bok 110 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1961
  • Henjum v. Bok 110 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1961
    6 See, Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456 , .
  • Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
  • Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
    Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456 , , cited by plaintiff, involved a fact situation where darkness had set in and confusion was probably caused by headlights.
  • Kedrowski v. Czech 69 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1955
  • Kedrowski v. Czech 69 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1955
    e, for, as commonly observed in the run-of-the-mill automobile accident cases, there is here a conflict in the testimony on every issue urged by the defendants as a basis for finding the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law: Anderson v. *126 Johnson, 208 Minn. 373, ; Cowperthwait v. Tadsen, 212 Minn. 49 , 2 N. W. (2d) 429 ; Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456 , ; Corridan v. Agranoff, 210 Minn. 237 , ; LeMire v. Nelson, 238 Minn. 501 , 58 N. W. (2d) 189 .
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
    Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456 , ; Brown v. Murphy Transfer & Storage Co. 190 Minn. 81 , ; Olson v. Purity Baking Co. 185 Minn. 571 , .
  • LeMire v. Nelson 58 N.W.2d 189 Minn. 1953
  • LeMire v. Nelson 58 N.W.2d 189 Minn. 1953
    See, Latourelle v. Horan, 212 Minn. 520 , ; Cowperthwait v. Tadsen, 212 Minn. 49 , ; Bakken v. Lewis, 223 Minn. 329 , ; Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456 , 299 N.W.
  • TePoel v. Larson 53 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1952
  • TePoel v. Larson 53 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1952
    If so, it was error.” In Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456 , , we held that since the Ryan case the presumption should not be given to the jury, but applied the rule of the Aubin case, that only the greater weight of the evidence is required to overcome a presumption, to an instruction relating to the proof required to establish contributory negligence.
  • Ammundson v. Falk 36 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1949
  • Ammundson v. Falk 36 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1949
    Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service *122 Co. 210 Minn. 456 , .
  • Gordon v. Pappas 34 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1948
  • Rue v. Wendland 33 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1948
  • Rue v. Wendland 33 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1948
    Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456 , ; Edblad v. Brower, 178 Minn. 465 , ; Smith v. Levison, 222 App. Div. 310 , 226 N. Y. S. 311.
  • Medved v. Doolittle 19 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1945
  • Medved v. Doolittle 19 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1945
    Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 (train standing across street in violation of statute obscured by darkness, smoke, and fog) ; Latourelle v. Horan, 212 Minn. 520 , 4 N. W. (2d) 343 (darkness); Cowperthwait v. Tadsen, 212 Minn. 49 , 2 N. W. (2d) 429 (darkness and curve in road); Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456 , (darkness and confusion caused by headlights); Bartley v. Fritz, 205 Minn. 192 , (darkness, car parked just over brow of hill, confusion caused by street lights) ; We
  • Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
  • Ogren v. City of Duluth 18 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1945
    Co. 215 Minn. 300 , 9 N. W. (2d) 730 ; Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456 , .
  • Roberts v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 9 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1943
  • Roberts v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 9 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1943
    Co. 206 Minn. 562 , , to the effect that “neither that presumption [against suicide], nor any other in the category of rebuttable presumptions, should be given to the jury in a civil case.” Duff v. Bemidji Motor Service Co. 210 Minn. 456, 462 , .