Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, 295 N.W. 412.

31 citing documents.

Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
New London Nursing Home, Inc. v. Lindeman 382 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
New London Nursing Home, Inc. v. Lindeman 382 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, Department of Social Security, 209 Minn. 58 , 295 N.W.
Shreve v. Department of Economic Security 283 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1979
Shreve v. Department of Economic Security 283 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1979
See, e. g., Kantor v. Honeywell, Inc., 286 Minn. 29 , Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , 295 N.W.
Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial Hospital 257 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1977
Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial Hospital 257 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1977
Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , 295 N.W.
Hylen v. Owens 251 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1977
Hylen v. Owens 251 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1977
Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , State v. Donovan, 218 Minn. 606 , Arens v. Village of Rogers, 240 Minn. 386 , appeal dismissed, 347 U. S. 949 , 74 S. Ct. 680 , 98 L. ed. 1096 (1954).
Schwartz v. Talmo 205 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1973
Schwartz v. Talmo 205 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1973
Loew v. Hagerle Brothers, 226 Minn. 485 , Hamlin v. Ladd, 217 Minn. 249 , Eldred v. Division of Employment & Security, 209 Minn. 58 , Arens v. Village of Rogers, 240 Minn. 386 , appeal dismissed, 347 U. S. 949 , 74 S. Ct. 680 , 98 L. ed. 1096 (1954); Kellerman v. City of St.
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local 59 v. Obermeyer 147 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1966
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local 59 v. Obermeyer 147 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1966
Co. 126 Minn. 286 , ; Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , ; State v. International Harvester Co. 241 Minn. 367 , 63 N. W. (2d) 547 , appeal dismissed, 348 U. S. 853 , 75 S. Ct. 78 , 99 L. ed. 672; Arens v. Village of Rogers, 240 Minn. 386 , 61 N. W. (2d) 508 , appeal dismissed, 347 U. S. 949 , 74 S. Ct. 680 , 98 L. ed. 1096; Dimke v. Finke, 209 Minn. 29 , 295
Ellis v. Village of Bloomington, Inc. 72 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1955
Ellis v. Village of Bloomington, Inc. 72 N.W.2d 350 Minn. 1955
Eldred v. Div. of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , .” As indicated, there is no dispute that the present village of Bloomington exceeds in population the 10,000 figure specified as the line of demarcation beyond which municipally owned liquor dispensaries are unauthorized except in the limited situations covered by | 340.353.
State v. International Harvester Co. 63 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1954
State v. International Harvester Co. 63 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1954
Co. 126 Minn. 286 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 412; Loew v. Hagerle Brothers, 226 Minn. 485 , 33 N. W. (2d) 598 ; State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. *375 573, , 123 A. L. R. 1045; Eldred v. Div. of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , ; Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co. 301 U. S. 495 , 57 S. Ct. 868 , 81 L. ed. 1245, 109 A. L. R. 1327; General Mills, Inc. v. Div. of Employment and Security, 224 Minn. 306 , 28 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State ex rel.
Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Commission 61 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1953
Arens v. Village of Rogers 61 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1953
Kaljuste v. Hennepin County Sanatorium Commission 61 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1953
Co. 126 Minn. 286 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 412; Loew v. Hagerle Brothers, 226 Minn. 485 , 33 N. W. (2d) 598 ; State v. Pehrson, 205 Minn. *418 573 , , 123 A. L. R. 1045; Eldred v. Div. of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , ; Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co. 301 U. S. 495 , 57 S. Ct. 868 , 81 L. ed. 1245, 109 A. L. R. 1327; General Mills, Inc. v. Div. of Employment and Security, 224 Minn. 306 , 28 N. W. (2d) 847 ; State ex rel.
Arens v. Village of Rogers 61 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1953
atter of policy, and the considerations which enter into it are so numerous and complex, that the legislature must necessarily be allowed a large discretion in the matter; and the courts ought not to hold a statute invalid or special legislation unless it appears very clearly that the basis of classification adopted is purely arbitrary.” More recently in Eldred v. Div. of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58, 63 , , this court said: “* * “ ‘The determination of the legislature is presumed to be
Loew v. Hagerle Brothers 33 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1948
Loew v. Hagerle Brothers 33 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1948
5 Gunderson v. Williams, supra; Eldred v. Division of Employment & Security, 209 Minn. 58 , .
General Mills, Inc. v. Division of Employment & Security 28 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1947
General Mills, Inc. v. Division of Employment & Security 28 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1947
Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , .
Leighton v. City of Minneapolis 25 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1946
Leighton v. City of Minneapolis 25 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1946
It may include cities now or hereafter having a population of 450,000 or over, and exclude others whose need is less, cf. Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 [ ].” *521 “Whether or not a legislative classification by population is reasonable and germane to the subject-matter depends largely on the facts which could have been known to or presumed by the legislature, cf. State v. Phillips, 176 Minn. 472 [ ].
State v. Industrial Tool & Die Works, Inc. 21 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1945
State v. Industrial Tool & Die Works, Inc. 21 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1945
1941 Supp. § 4337-39); Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58 , .
State v. Donovan 16 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1944
State v. Donovan 16 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1944
In Eldred v. Division of Employment and Security, 209 Minn. 58, 68 , , this language used by this court is pertinent here: - * The determination of the legislature is presumed to be supported by facts known to it, unless facts judicially known or proved preclude that possibility.” *611 We have already described the classes into which employers are divided under