Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Service & Security, Inc. v. St. Paul Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 300 N.W. 811.

28 citing documents.

Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd. 153 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd. 153 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199, 203 , ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 .
Paulsrud v. Tyler 241 Minn. 548 Minn. 1964
Paulsrud v. Tyler 241 Minn. 548 Minn. 1964
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199, 203 , .” Tested by the stated rule, we find that there is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the view that the services in question were performed under circumstances from which a promise to pay their reasonable value may be implied and that the essential facts found by the trial court ar
Nelson v. Tripp 118 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1962
Nelson v. Tripp 118 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1962
Paul Federal S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , 300 N.W.
G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , ; Hoverson v. Hoverson, 216 Minn. 237 , 12 N. W. (2d) 497 ; Maust v. Maust, 222 Minn. 135 , 23 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Olson v. Mullen, 244 Minn. 31 , 68 N. W. (2d) 640 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , .
Marquardt v. Stark 58 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1953
Marquardt v. Stark 58 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1953
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , .
Borstad v. Ulstad 45 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1951
Borstad v. Ulstad 45 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1951
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , .
Ball v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 30 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1948
Ball v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 30 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1948
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Nelson v. Hacking 29 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1947
Nelson v. Hacking 29 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1947
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , .
Maust v. Maust 23 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1946
Maust v. Maust 23 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1946
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199, 203 , .” The fact that property received by plaintiff from defendant in this case, whether in the form of money or otherwise, has been converted into other property or used in acquiring other property does not deprive defendant of the benefits of § 518.19 (§ 8598).
Saari v. Dunwoody Iron Mining Co. 21 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1945
Saari v. Dunwoody Iron Mining Co. 21 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1945
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199, 203 , , where we said: “* * * As to many of his [appellant’s] claims there was 'direct conflict in the testimony which the trial court resolved in defendant’s favor.
Meiners v. Kennedy 20 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1945
Meiners v. Kennedy 20 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1945
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199, 203 , .
Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co. 7 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1943
Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co. 7 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1943
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199, 203 , ; Snider v. Peters Home Bldg.
Ylijarvi v. Brockphaler 7 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1942
Ylijarvi v. Brockphaler 7 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1942
Paul F. S. & L. Assn. 211 Minn. 199 , ; Elliott v. Caldwell, 43 Minn. 357 , , 9 L. R. A. 52, supra.