Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brin v. Sherill, 300 N.W. 195.

17 citing documents.

Morrison v. Doyle 582 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1998
In re Watland, 211 Minn. 84, 91 , 300 N.W.
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
ded by the surrounding circumstances, due weight being given to all its language, with some meaning being given, if possible, to all parts, expressions and words used, discarding and disregarding no parts as meaningless, if any meaning can be given them consistently with the rest of the instrument.” In re Anneke’s Trust, 229 Minn. 60, 71 , (quoting In re Watland’s Trust, 211 Minn. 84, 91 , 300 N.W.
In Matter of Campbell's Trusts 258 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1977
See, In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , 300 N.W.
In Re Trust Created by Warner 117 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1962
In the case of In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84, 92 , , we said: *469 In construing such clauses, we should try to determine the purpose the settlor had in including them in the light of the instrument as a whole and to give effect to such purpose.
In Re Trusteeship Created by Fiske 242 Minn. 452 Minn. 1954
977 ; In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , 300 N.W.
Peters v. Ueland 65 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 1954
In re Trusts Created by Butler, 223 Minn. 196 , 26 N. W. (2d) 204 , 172 A. L. R. 977; In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , .
First Trust Co. v. Cochrane 61 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1953
See, In re Trust Under Will of Comstock, 219 Minn. 325 , 17 N. W. (2d) 656 ; In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , ; In re Trusteeship Created Under Will of Ordean, 195 Minn. 120 , .
In Re Trust Created by Moulton 233 Minn. 286 Minn. 1951
In In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84, 91 , 300 N.W.
Van Dyke v. First National Bank 46 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1951
In In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84, 91 , , we said: “First to be determined is donor’s intention as expressed in the language used in the trust instrument.
In Re Trust Created by Anneke 38 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1949
In In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84, 91 , , we stated the rule applicable to the construction of a trust instrument thus: “First to be determined is donor’s intention as expressed in the language used in the trust instrument.
In Re Trust Under Will of Comstock 17 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1945
"In that determination" (quoting the court in In re Trust of Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , 91 , 300 N.W.
First & American National Bank v. Andrews 17 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1945
“In that determination” (quoting the court in In re Trust of Watland, 211 Minn. 84, 91 , ), “we are to be guided by the well-known principle that the entire instrument must be considered, ‘aided by the surrounding circumstances, due weight being given to all its language, with some meaning being given, if possible, to all parts, expressions and words used, discarding and disregard
Northwestern National Bank & Trust Co. v. Pirich 9 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
The rules have been considered in such recent cases as In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187 , ; In re Trusts Under Will of McCann, 212 Minn. 233 , 3 N. W. (2d) 226 ; In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , ; In re Trusts Under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , ; Radintz v. N. W. Nat.
In Re Trust Under Will of Schultz 9 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
899 ; In re Trusts Under Will of McCann, 212 Minn. 233 , ; In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , 300 N.W.
In Re Trusts Under Will of McCann 3 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1942
899 , 901 ; In re Trust of Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , 91 , 300 N.W.
Pritchard v. Carpenter 3 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1942
All provisions should be harmonized and given meaning if possible.” In re Trusteeship Under Will of Jones, 202 Minn. 187, 189 , ; In re Trust of Watland, 211 Minn. 84, 91 , .
In Re Trust Created by Watland 300 N.W. 195 Minn. 1941