DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. Winkle, 5 N.W.2d 355.

33 citing documents.

  • Berry v. Haertel 170 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1969
  • Berry v. Haertel 170 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1969
    Paul Union Stockyards Co. 271 Minn. 233 , 135 N. W. (2d) 499 ; Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N. W. (2d) 247 ; Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 .
  • Hedglin v. Church of St. Paul of Sauk Centre 158 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1968
  • Hedglin v. Church of St. Paul of Sauk Centre 158 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1968
    1 On the duty owed business guests or invitees, see Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N. W. (2d) 247 ; Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260; Prosser, Torts (2 ed.) § 78; 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts, § 27.12; Prosser, Business Visitors and Invitees, 26 Minn. L. Rev. 573 ; Paton, Invitees, 27 Minn. L. Rev. 75 .
  • Bonniwell v. SAINT PAUL UNION STOCKYARDS COMPANY 135 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1965
  • Bonniwell v. SAINT PAUL UNION STOCKYARDS COMPANY 135 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1965
    See, Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 ; McGenty v. John A. Stevenson & Co. 218 Minn. 311 , 15 N. W. (2d) 874 ; Schrader v. Kriesel, 232 Minn. 238 , 45 N. W. (2d) 395 ; Mayzlik v. Lansing Elev.
  • Geislinger v. Village of Watkins 130 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1964
  • Geislinger v. Village of Watkins 130 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1964
    Likewise, in Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 , a tumed-up strip and a worn edging on a stair tread were held evidence of an owner’s negligence.
  • Johnson v. O'BRIEN 105 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1960
  • Johnson v. O'BRIEN 105 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1960
    They contend that in Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co. 214 Minn. 64 , 7 N. W. (2d) 684 , actual knowledge of the defect was present and that Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 , involved a situation in which an injury occurred on a stairway used in common with other tenants.
  • Mattson v. St. Luke's Hospital 89 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1958
  • Mattson v. St. Luke's Hospital 89 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1958
    1 See, Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N. W. (2d) 247 ; Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260; Restatement, Torts, § 332; Prosser, Torts (2 ed.) § 78; 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts, § 27.12; 26 Minn. L. Rev. 573 ; 27 Minn. L. Rev. 75 .
  • Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co. 82 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1957
  • Strong v. Shefveland 81 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1957
  • Strong v. Shefveland 81 N.W.2d 247 Minn. 1957
    In Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77, 80 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355, 357 , this court announced the rule applicable to business visitors by saying that “A possessor of premises used by business visitors, while not an insurer of their safety, is bound to exercise reasonable care to construct and to maintain his premises in a reasonably safe condition for their us
  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
    Schrader v. Kriesel, supra; Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 .
  • Graeber v. Anderson 53 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1952
  • Graeber v. Anderson 53 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1952
    Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 .
  • Swenson v. Slawik 53 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1952
  • Swenson v. Slawik 53 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1952
    Iverson v. Quam, supra; McGenty v. John A. Stephenson & Co. 218 Minn. 311 , 15 N. W. (2d) 874 ; Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 ; Heinman v. United Properties, Inc. 210 Minn. 343 , ; 52 C. J. S., Landlord and Tenant, §§ 417(b), 418(a); Restatement, Torts, § 360.
  • Schrader v. Kriesel 45 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1950
  • Schrader v. Kriesel 45 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1950
    9 The duty owed to business invitees generally is well stated in Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77, 80 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355, 357 , as follows: “A possessor of premises used by business visitors, while not an insurer of their safety, is bound to exercise reasonable care to construct and to maintain his premises in a reasonably safe condition for their use.
  • Breimhorst v. Beckman 35 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1949
  • Breimhorst v. Beckman 35 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1949
    3 Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co. 214 Minn. 64 , 7 N. W. (2d) 684 ; see, Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 ; Prosser, Torts, § 81, p. 651; 26 Mich.
  • Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System of Minnesota, Inc. 31 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1948
  • Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System of Minnesota, Inc. 31 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1948
    Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 ; Williams v. Dickson, 122 Minn. 49 , ; Prosser, Torts, 656; Restatement, Torts, § 360c.
  • McGenty v. John A. Stephenson & Co. 15 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1944
  • McGenty v. John A. Stephenson & Co. 15 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1944
    Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 ; Heinman v. United Properties, Inc. 210 Minn. 343 , .
  • White v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 11 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
  • White v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co. 11 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1943
    Another class of cases to which plaintiff refers is Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 , and Reynolds v. Land Mortgage & Title Co. 114 Conn. 447 , 159 A. 282 , where there is a duty of the landlord, or a defendant, to keep a building, or certain parts thereof, in a reasonably safe condition for persons rightfully there.
  • Lunde v. National Citizens Bank 6 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1942
  • Lunde v. National Citizens Bank 6 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1942
    See the recent decision of this court in Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 .