DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co., 6 N.W.2d 812.

34 citing documents.

  • Voight v. Rettinger Transportation, Inc. 306 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1981
  • Lehn v. Kladt 250 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1977
  • Lehn v. Kladt 250 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1977
    Youngberg v. The Donlin Co. 264 Minn. 421 , Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331
  • Lundgaard v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ETC. 237 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1975
  • Lundgaard v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ETC. 237 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1975
    1 See, also, Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331
  • Williams v. Hoyt Construction Co., Inc. 237 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 1975
  • Williams v. Hoyt Construction Co., Inc. 237 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 1975
    See, Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , 1 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 25.00.
  • Bonfig v. Megarry Brothers, Inc. 199 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1972
  • Funk v. A. F. Scheppmann & Son Construction Co. 199 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1972
  • Funk v. A. F. Scheppmann & Son Construction Co. 199 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1972
    16: “* * * Where the employer regularly furnished transportation to his employees to and from the place of employment such employees are subject to this chapter while being so transported * * This provision, for reasons stated in Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , and again stated in Bonfig v. Megarry Brothers, Inc. 294 Minn. 180 , , filed herewith, are inapplicable with respect to an employee who, although using his employer’s motor vehicle with the employer’s permission, is t
  • Bonfig v. Megarry Brothers, Inc. 199 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1972
    Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331, 336 , Youngberg v. The Donlin Co. 264 Minn. 421, 423
  • Jonas v. Lillyblad 137 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1965
  • Distinguished Jonas v. Lillyblad 137 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1965
    Co. 138 Minn. 312 , *305 ; Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812 ; and Youngberg v. The Donlin Co. 264 Minn. 421 , 119 N. W. (2d) 746 .
  • Fleischer v. State Department of Highways 77 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1956
  • Fleischer v. State Department of Highways 77 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1956
    Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Jurich v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. 233 Minn. 108 , 46 N. W. (2d) 237 ; Fisher v. Fisher, 226 Minn. 171 , 32 N. W. (2d) 424 ; Simpson v. Gold, 221 Minn. 528 , 22 N. W. (2d) 923 ; Zobitz v. City of Ely, 219 Minn. 411 , 18 N. W. (2d) 126 ; Bergstrom v. Brehmer, 214 Minn. 326 , 8 N. W. (2d) 328 ; Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812 ; Tometz v. Biwabik Min.
  • Cosgriff v. Duluth Firemen's Relief Assn. 46 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1951
  • Cosgriff v. Duluth Firemen's Relief Assn. 46 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1951
    See, Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co. 214 Minn. 548 , 9 N. W. (2d) *240 237; Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331, 337 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812, 815 ; Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc. 177 Minn. 503 , .
  • McBride v. Preston Creamery Assn. 36 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1949
  • McBride v. Preston Creamery Assn. 36 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1949
    Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812 ; Brusven v. Ballord, 217 Minn. 502 , 14 N. W. (2d) 861 ; Callaghan v. Brown, 218 Minn. 440 , 16 N. W. (2d) 317 .
  • Locke v. County of Steele 27 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1947
  • Locke v. County of Steele 27 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1947
    Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331, 340 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812, 817 , citing Nehring v. Minnesota M. & M. Co. 193 Minn. 169 , ; Taylor v. M. A. Gammino Const. Co. 127 Conn. 528 , 18 A. (2d) 400; and Voehl v. Indemnity Ins.
  • Rhea v. Overholt 25 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1946
  • Rhea v. Overholt 25 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1946
    Likewise, in Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812 , where we definitely held that travel by an employe in a digression from the prosecution of the employer’s business is not covered by the compensation act.
  • Saari v. Dunwoody Iron Mining Co. 21 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1945
  • Saari v. Dunwoody Iron Mining Co. 21 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1945
    Paul Terminal Warehouse Co. 206 Minn. 96 , ; Budd v. C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. 209 Minn. 490 , ; Schultz v. U. S. Bedding Co. 210 Minn. 68 , 297 N. W. *98 351; Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812 .
  • Callaghan v. Brown 16 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1944
  • Callaghan v. Brown 16 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1944
    that an injury “may be received fin the course of the employment’ and still have no causal connection with it,” and in order to arise out of the employment it must reasonably appear, “from all the facts and circumstances, that there is a causal connection between the conditions which the emr ployer puts about the employe and the resulting injury.” See, also, Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812 .
  • Brusven v. Ballord 14 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1944
  • Brusven v. Ballord 14 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1944
    In Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331, 336 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812, 815 , this court stated: “* * * we have said that an injury is received in the course of employment 'when it comes while the employe is doing his, work’ and that 'it “arises out of” the employment when it reasonably appears from all the facts and circumstances, that there is a causal connectio
  • Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Ozmun 14 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1944
  • Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Ozmun 14 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1944
    Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812 ; Nesbitt v. Twin City F. & F. Co. 145 Minn; 286, , 10 A. L. R. 165.
  • Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 9 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1943
  • Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co. 9 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1943
  • Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 9 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1943
    Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co. 213 Minn. 331 , 6 N. W. (2d) 812 .