Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co., 5 N.W.2d 492.

51 citing documents.

Cory L. Hendricksen, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Ashton Hendricksen, decedent, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , (quotation omitted).
Werner v. MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS LLC 782 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Werner v. MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS LLC 782 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Co., 213 Minn. 106, 114-15 , -97 (1942) (holding that the standard of conduct required in a negligence action is an objective standard, which is not the conduct of the individual but that of an ordinarily prudent person); Pribil v. Archdiocese of St.
Emerson v. Eystad 181 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1970
Emerson v. Eystad 181 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1970
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 ; and Corridan v. Agranoff, 210 Minn. 237 , .
Martinson v. Scherbel 129 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1964
Martinson v. Scherbel 129 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1964
Co. 213 Minn. 106, 113 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492, 496 ; Hagen v. Snow, 244 Minn. 101 , 69 N. W. (2d) 100 ; Borris v. Cox, 245 Minn. 515 , 73 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Lynghaug v. Payte, 247 Minn. 186 , 76 N. W. (2d) 660 , 56 A. L. R. (2d) 1090.
Hanson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 124 N.W.2d 486 Minn. 1963
Hanson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 124 N.W.2d 486 Minn. 1963
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 ; Hicks v. N. P. Ry.
Bigo v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 115 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1962
Bigo v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 115 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1962
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 , involving the same railroad company as the defendant here, plaintiff obtained a verdict for injuries sustained when his car collided with one of defendant’s trains at a highway crossing.
Krafft v. Hirt 110 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1961
Krafft v. Hirt 110 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1961
Co. 213 Minn. 106, 113 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492, 496 .
Lynghaug v. Payte 76 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1956
Lynghaug v. Payte 76 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1956
Co. 213 Minn. 106, 113 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492, 496 .
Jablinske v. Eckstrom 76 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
Jablinske v. Eckstrom 76 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 .
Schubitzke v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 69 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1955
Schubitzke v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 69 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1955
Co. 213 Minn. 106, 111 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492, 495 .
Jurgensen v. Schirmer Transportation Co. 64 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1954
Jurgensen v. Schirmer Transportation Co. 64 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1954
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 (see dissenting opinion).
Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc. 62 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1954
Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc. 62 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 1954
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 ; Nicholas v. Minnesota Milk Co. 212 Minn. 333 , 4 N. W. (2d) 84 .
Leman v. Standard Oil Co. 57 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1953
Leman v. Standard Oil Co. 57 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1953
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 .
Swanson v. Carlson 43 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1950
Swanson v. Carlson 43 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1950
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 ; Becklund v. Daniels, 230 Minn. 442 , 42 N. W. (2d) 8 .
Warning v. KANABEC COUNTY CO-OPERATIVE OIL ASSN. 42 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1950
Warning v. KANABEC COUNTY CO-OPERATIVE OIL ASSN. 42 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1950
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 ; Lee v. Molter, 227 Minn. 557 , 35 N. W. (2d) 801 .
Becklund v. Daniels 42 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1950
Becklund v. Daniels 42 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1950
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 .
Halloran v. Tousignant 41 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1950
Halloran v. Tousignant 41 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1950
Co. 213 Minn. 106, 113 , 5 N. W. [2d] 492, 496; Lee v. Molter, 227 Minn. 557 , 35 H. W. [2d] 801); and where the evidence might excuse failure to comply with the statute, the court will not direct a verdict.
Demmer v. Grunke 42 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1950
Demmer v. Grunke 42 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1950
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 113 , , 496 .
Lee v. Molter 35 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1949
Lee v. Molter 35 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1949
Co. 213 Minn. 106, 113 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492, 496 , where we stated: “* * * The prima, facie provision is still a rule against the violator, not in his favor.
Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 31 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 1948
Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 31 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 1948
Co. 213 Minn. 106, 113 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 , 496: * * The defendant having proved only a violation of the statute connected as cause with the injury, and no more, shifted to plaintiff the burden of the evidence, as distinguished from the burden of proof.
Olson v. Anderson 28 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1947
Olson v. Anderson 28 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1947
Co. 213 Minn. 106, 113 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492, 496 .
Mlenek v. Fleming 27 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1947
Mlenek v. Fleming 27 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1947
Co. 213 Minn. 106, 111 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492, 495 , the court said: “It is contended that the fog was a distracting circumstance.
Veaasen v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. 27 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1947
Veaasen v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. 27 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1947
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , *Page 400 .
Wessman v. Scandrett 14 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1944
Wessman v. Scandrett 14 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1944
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 .
Olson v. Hector Construction Co. Inc. 13 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1944
Olson v. Hector Construction Co. Inc. 13 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1944
Co. 213 Minn. 106 , 5 N. W. (2d) 492 , we held that the driver of an automobile was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law because he entered into an area of dense fog at a rate of speed which'precluded his ability to stop after dis *436 covery of danger ahead.
Lee v. Zaske 6 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1942