Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co., 8 N.W.2d 28.

28 citing documents.

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co., d 28, 33–35 (Minn. 1943) (citing Koivisto v. Bankers’ & Merchs.
Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc. 433 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc. 433 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Derrick v. The Drolson Co., Inc., 244 Minn. 144, 152 , Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co., 214 Minn. 251, 261
Statewide Insurance v. Dewar 694 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, Iowa 231 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1975
Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, Iowa 231 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1975
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , Restatement, Agency 2d, § 144.
Pesina Ex Rel. Pesina v. Juarez 181 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
Pesina Ex Rel. Pesina v. Juarez 181 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1970
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28 ; Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers’ Mutual Fire Ins.
Dike v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 170 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1969
Dike v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 170 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1969
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28 .
Julien v. Spring Lake Park Agency, Inc. 166 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1969
Julien v. Spring Lake Park Agency, Inc. 166 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1969
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28 , we gave effect to an oral binder made by an agent where no policy was written and the loss occurred about 6 months after the binder.
Oster v. Riley 150 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1967
Oster v. Riley 150 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1967
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28 , for the proposition that “a binding contract of insurance does not become effective until one of the possible insurers is selected by the agent.” We held in that case ( 214 Minn. 252 , 8 N. W. [2d] 30): “* * * [W]here an application for insurance is made to an agent who *277 represents several comp
Morrison v. Swenson 142 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1966
Morrison v. Swenson 142 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1966
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28 .
Nehring v. Bast 103 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1960
Nehring v. Bast 103 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1960
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28 , is equally persuasive.
Fox v. Morse 96 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1959
Fox v. Morse 96 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1959
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28 .
Gulbrandson v. EMPIRE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. 87 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1958
Gulbrandson v. EMPIRE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. 87 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1958
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28 ; see, also, Quinn-Shepherdson Co. v. United States F. & G. Co. 142 Minn. 428 , ; Prosser, The Making of a Contract of Insurance in Minnesota, 17 Minn. L. Rev. 567 ; Note, 34 Minn. L. Rev. 231 .
Johnson v. Ostenso Ex Rel. Ostenso 84 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1957
Johnson v. Ostenso Ex Rel. Ostenso 84 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1957
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28 , as controlling.
Sward v. Nash 40 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1950
Sward v. Nash 40 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1950
Co. 214 Minn. 251 , 8 N. W. [2d] 28) only confirm the rule.
State v. McBride 9 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1943
State v. McBride 9 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1943
Co. 214 Minn. 251, 258 , 8 N. W. (2d) 28, 32 .