DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Aide v. Taylor, 7 N.W.2d 757.

26 citing documents.

  • Kyle Wendell Else, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    are not conclusive against him and may be explaine d, limited, qualified and contradicted.” -60 (Minn. 1943).
  • State v. Posten 302 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Posten 302 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1981
    See for example Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212
  • Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
  • Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
    Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757 , 145 A. L. R. 530, involved a pedestrian’s contributory negligence at a time when he was struck by an automobile traveling on the wrong side of the street.
  • Ulrich v. Minneapolis Boxing and Wrestling Club, Inc. 129 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1964
  • Ulrich v. Minneapolis Boxing and Wrestling Club, Inc. 129 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1964
    See, Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757 , 145 A. L. R. 530.
  • Kellett v. Wasnie 112 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1962
  • Kellett v. Wasnie 112 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1962
    For instance, in Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212, 217 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757, 759 , 145 A. L. R. 530, 534, this court said: “* * * a party’s extrajudicial admissions, absent an estoppel to deny their truth, as here, are not conclusive against him and may be explained, limited, qualified, and contradicted.
  • Fieve v. Emmeck 78 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1956
  • Fieve v. Emmeck 78 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1956
    10 See, also, Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757 , 145 A. L. R. 530; 3 Wigmore, Evidence (3 ed.) § 1044; 7 Id.
  • State v. Anderson 78 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1956
  • State v. Anderson 78 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1956
    The rule governing such situations is expressed in Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212, 217 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757, 760 , 145 A. L. R. 530, 534, where we stated: “* * * If it conclusively appears that the party was incapacitated from making a rational admission, as where he was at the time in a coma, the question becomes one of admissibility, and the statement should be ruled out entirely.” Likewise, in Sta
  • Schneider v. the Texas Co. 69 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1955
  • Schneider v. the Texas Co. 69 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1955
    Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212, 219 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757, 761 , 145 A. L. R. 530.
  • Dix v. Harris Machinery Co. 60 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
  • Dix v. Harris Machinery Co. 60 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
    Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757 ; Honer v. Nicholson, 198 Minn. 55 , ; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
    Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757 , 145 A. L. R. 530; Peterson v. Miller, supra; Annotations, 79 A. L. R. 1073, 1089, and 145 A. L. R. 536.
  • Tellock v. Backholm 54 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1952
  • Ammundson v. Falk 36 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1949
  • Ammundson v. Falk 36 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1949
    Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757 , 145 A. L. R. 530.
  • Cooper v. Hoeglund 22 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1946
  • Cooper v. Hoeglund 22 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1946
    & Supp. § 10351; see, Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757 , 145 A. L. R. 530.
  • Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1944
  • Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1944
    Rather, it comes within cases like Aide v. Taylor, 214 Minn. 212 , 7 N. W. (2d) 757 , 145 A. L. R. 530, where we held that the weight of the evidence is not determined by the number of witnesses.