DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hursh v. Lee, 214 Minn. 448.

15 citing documents.

  • In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
    who breaches his duty to his client forfeits his right to 17 compensation.”); In re Lee’s Estate, 214 Minn. 448, 460, (“[A]n attorney at law who is unfaithful in the performance of his duties forfeits his right to compensation.”); see also Dinter v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 651 A.2d 1033, 1039 (N.J.
  • In re the Trust Agreement of D. Robert Sykes. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448, 458, Boyum v. Jordan, 146 Minn. 66, 68-69, 178 N.W.
  • Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership 799 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
    The issue here is similar to one addressed by the supreme court in In re Lee’s Estate, 214 Minn. 448
  • In Re the Revocable Trust of Margolis 731 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    See In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448
  • Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
    “Unquestioned fidelity to their real interests is the duty of every attorney to his clients.” In re Lee’s Estate, 214 Minn. 448, 460
  • Matter of Boss 487 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    at 287 , d at 654 ; see also In re Lee's Estate, 214 Minn. 448, 457-59 , (places similar burden on a trustee whose interest conflicts with the trust).
  • Gilchrist v. Perl 387 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1986
    In In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448 , involving a blatant conflict of interest situation, this court stressed the strict fidelity required of an attorney and said, “When a breach of faith occurs, the attorney’s right to compensation is gone.” Id.
  • Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 345 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1984
    In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448
  • Rice v. Perl 320 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1982
    In In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448, 460 , this court stated: It is equally well settled that an attorney at law who is unfaithful in the performance of his duties forfeits his right to compensation.
  • In Re Trust Created by Warner 117 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1962
  • In Re Trust Created by Warner 117 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1962
    In In re Trust Created by Will of Bailey, 241 Minn. 143 , 62 N. W. (2d) 829 , we discussed some of the problems involved and there held that under the terms of the trust instrument involved in that case the trustee could deduct a reasonable amount for depreciation of a “going business.” In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448 , 9 N. W. (2d) 245 , involved an action in which we were mainly concerned with the actions of an attorney acting in a dual capacity in violation of his fiduciary relationship to
  • In Re Trust Created by Moulton 233 Minn. 286 Minn. 1951
    426 ; In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448 , 9 N.W.
  • Van Dyke v. First National Bank 46 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1951
    Bank v. Olufson, 181 Minn. 289 , ; Erickson v. Erickson, 197 Minn. 71 , , ; In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448 , 9 N. W. (2d) 245 ; 1 Bogert, Trusts and Trustees, § 222.
  • Petraborg v. Zontelli 15 N.W.2d 174 Minn. 1944
    In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448 , 9 N. W. (2d) 245 .
  • Hlubeck v. Beeler 9 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1943
    2 (Cf. In re Estate of Lee, 214 Minn. 448 , 9 N. W. (2d) 245 , involving an attorney’s right to compensation where he was guilty of breach of duty.