Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schmidt v. McKenzie, 9 N.W.2d 1.

27 citing documents.

Menard, Inc., Minn. 2021
Landmark Community Bank, N.A. v. John D. Klingelhutz 874 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Landmark Community Bank, N.A. v. John D. Klingelhutz 874 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 7
Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite Re, Inc. 844 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2014
Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite Re, Inc. 844 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2014
See Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 6 , -4 (1943).
Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
[because] there must be a principal debtor or obligor[,] [and] [w]ithout a principal debt there can be no guaranty- Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 6 , (quotation omitted).
Loving & Associates, Inc. v. Carothers 619 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Loving & Associates, Inc. v. Carothers 619 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 6-8 , -4 (1943).
Estate of Frantz v. Page 426 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Estate of Frantz v. Page 426 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Dewey v. Henry’s Drive-Ins of Minnesota, Inc., 301 Minn. 366, 370 , Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 9
Miller v. Anderson 394 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Miller v. Anderson 394 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 9
Charmoll Fashions, Inc. v. Otto 248 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1976
Charmoll Fashions, Inc. v. Otto 248 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1976
In Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 6 , we defined a guaranty as— “* * * ‘a collateral contract to answer for the payment of a debt or the performance of a duty in case of the default of another who is primarily liable to pay or perform the same.’ 3 Dun-nell, Dig.
Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Central Enterprises of Superior, Inc. 247 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1976
Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Central Enterprises of Superior, Inc. 247 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1976
2d, Guaranty, § 81; Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1
Dewey v. Henry's Drive-Ins of Minnesota, Inc. 222 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1974
Dewey v. Henry's Drive-Ins of Minnesota, Inc. 222 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1974
Clark v. Otto B. Ashbach & Sons, Inc. 241 Minn. 267, 276 , Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 9
Dresser v. NORTH STAR WORLD'S FAIR CORPORATION 185 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1971
Dresser v. NORTH STAR WORLD'S FAIR CORPORATION 185 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1971
Although Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1 , 9 N. W. (2d) 1 , held that any material departure from the terms of a guaranty contract will release the guarantor, we find no deviation here which was prejudicial to Structural.
Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co. 110 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1961
Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co. 110 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1961
This language falls squarely within the definition of a contract of guaranty as given in Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 6 , 9 N. W. (2d) 1 ,3: “* * * a collateral contract to answer for the payment of a debt or the performance of a duty in case of the default of another who is primarily liable to pay or perform the same.” 6 *33 Plaintiffs, however, point out that by the terms of the September 9, 1957, agreement their liability was mad
American Tobacco Co. v. Chalfen 108 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1961
American Tobacco Co. v. Chalfen 108 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1961
5 Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1 , 9 N. W. (2d) 1 ; J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. McCall, 116 Minn. 389 , .
Clark v. Otto B. Ashbach & Sons, Inc. 64 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1954
Clark v. Otto B. Ashbach & Sons, Inc. 64 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1954
In Schmidt v. McKenzie, 215 Minn. 1, 6 , 9 N. W. (2d) 1, 3 , we defined a guaranty as “a collateral contract to answer for the payment of a debt or the performance of a duty in case of the default of another who is primarily liable to pay or perform the same.” In the instant case, Calihan and Drews entered into a collateral contract to answer for the pe