DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Robinette v. Price, 8 N.W.2d 800.

61 citing documents.

  • Harding v. Ohio Casualty Insurance 41 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1950
    Robinette v. Price, 214 Minn. 521 , 8 N. W. (2d) 800 ; Bohn Mfg.
  • Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556 35 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1948
  • Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556 35 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1948
    In Robinette v. Price, 214 Minn. 521 , 533 , , 807 , we held that certain duties of the county welfare board are quasi-judicial in character.
  • Hoppe v. Klapperich 28 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1947
  • Hoppe v. Klapperich 28 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1947
    A sheriff is protected from liability for acts done in executing the process and orders of a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter when the process is fair on its face (Robinette v. Price, 214 Minn. 521 , 8 N. W. [2d] 800), and he cannot be made liable for its execution in a legal manner even if he personally knows of jurisdictional defects in the preliminary proceedings pursuant to which the process was issued.
  • Christgau v. Fine 27 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1947
  • Christgau v. Fine 27 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1947
    See, Robinette v. Price, 214 Minn. 521 , 8 N. W. (2d) 800 .
  • Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley 14 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1944
  • Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley 14 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1944
    48 C. J., Paupers, § 142; Robinette v. Price, 214 Minn. 521 , 8 N. W. (2d) 800 ; Inhabitants of Somerset v. Inhabitants of Dighton, 12 Mass. 383 ; Town of Londonderry v. Town of Acton, 3 Vt. 122 ; Town of Dummerston v. Town of Newfane, 37 Vt. 9 , supra; Town of Peacham v. Town of Waterford, 46 Vt. 154 ; Inter The Parishes of Ryslip and Harrow [Hill.
  • State v. Burns 9 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1943
  • State v. Burns 9 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1943
    It is important in considering the case to bear in mind that (1) a conspiracy to commit a crime is a separate, substantive offense from the crime which is the object of the conspiracy, State v. Peterson, 213 Minn. 56 , 4 N. W. (2d) 826 ; and (2) persons may combine to commit lawful acts, Robinette v. Price, 214 Minn. 521 , 8 N. W. (2d) 800 ; Boasberg v. Walker, 111 Minn. 445 , .