DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Merritt v. Stuve, 9 N.W.2d 329.

59 citing documents.

  • Spaeth v. City of Plymouth 344 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1984
  • Spaeth v. City of Plymouth 344 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1984
    Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kluver, 302 Minn. 310, 313 , Schoening v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc., 265 Minn. 119, 127 , Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 50
  • Thielbar v. Juenke 189 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1971
  • Thielbar v. Juenke 189 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1971
    Kachman v. Blosberg, 251 Minn. 224 , 87 N. W. (2d) 687 ; Cosgrove v. McGonagle, 196 Minn. 6 , ; Anderson v. Davis, 151 Minn. 454 , ; Hacker v. Berkner, 263 Minn. 278 , 117 N. W. (2d) 13 ; Henjum v. Bok, 261 Minn. 74 , 110 N. W. (2d) 461 ; Lee v. Smith, 253 Minn. 401 , 92 N. W. (2d) 117 ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Emerson v. Eystad 181 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1970
  • Emerson v. Eystad 181 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1970
    directions that it is to be applied only if the jury finds that the emergency was not created by the one who seeks to invoke the rule.” See, also, Roeck v. Halvorson, 254 Minn. 394 , 95 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc. 241 Minn. 79 , 62 N. W. (2d) 492 ; Gran v. Dasovic, 275 Minn. 415 , 147 N. W. (2d) 576 ; Daly v. Springer, 244 Minn. 108 , 69 N. W. (2d) 98 ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Johnson v. Townsend, 195 Minn. 107 , .
  • Fisher v. Edberg 176 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1970
  • Fisher v. Edberg 176 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1970
    here involved, the defense of contributory negligence is not effective as against him.’ “ * * Whether the time ever came when it might be said that plaintiff should have realized that defendant was not going to seasonably yield the right of way and that an accident was immiment was * * * a question of fact and not one of law.’ Olson v. Byam, 176 Minn. 619, 620 , ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .” See, also, Kolatz v. Kelly, supra; 13B Dunnell, Dig.
  • Boraas v. Carlson 127 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1964
  • Boraas v. Carlson 127 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1964
    Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Abraham v. Byman, 214 Minn. 355 , 8 N. W. (2d) 231 ; Olson v. Byam, 176 Minn. 619 , .
  • Knopp v. Gutterman 102 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
  • Knopp v. Gutterman 102 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
    Co. 215 Minn. 265 , 9 N. W. (2d) 754 , 146 A. L. R. 1223; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Minder v. Peterson 93 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1958
  • Minder v. Peterson 93 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1958
    6 Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Schendel v. Klein, 215 Minn. 73 , 9 N. W. (2d) 342 ; Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc. 241 Minn. 79 , 62 N. W. (2d) 492 .
  • Coble v. Lacey 90 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1958
  • Coble v. Lacey 90 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1958
    Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Scattergood v. Keil, 233 Minn. 340 , 45 N. W. (2d) 650 .
  • Peterson v. Lang 58 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1953
  • Peterson v. Lang 58 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1953
    4 Packar v. Brooks, 211 Minn. 99 , ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
  • Pettit v. Lifson 57 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1953
    29; Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Marty v. Nordby, 201 Minn. 469 , .
  • Bosell v. Rannestad 33 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1948
  • Bosell v. Rannestad 33 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1948
    “* * * the test to be used in determining whether a given roadway is public or private does not turn upon the amount of travel or use made thereof, but rather upon the right of the public generally to use the way for vehicular traffic.” Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 51 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329, 333 .
  • Delyea v. Goossen 32 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1948
  • Delyea v. Goossen 32 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1948
    “The issue of negligence is generally a fact question for the jury to determine.” Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 55 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329, 334 .
  • Moore v. Kujath 29 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1947
  • Moore v. Kujath 29 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1947
    Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 57 , , 335 ; Bloomquist v. Thomas, 215 Minn. 35 , 39 , , 340 .
  • Sanders v. Gilbertson 29 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1947
  • Sanders v. Gilbertson 29 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1947
    Johnson v. Townsend, 195 Minn. 107 , ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Solosky v. J. A. Johnson Co. 27 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1947
  • Solosky v. J. A. Johnson Co. 27 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1947
    “The issue of negligence is generally a fact question for the jury to determine.” Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 55 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329, 334 ; Abraham v. Byman, 214 Minn. 355 , 8 N. W. (2d) 231 .
  • Squillace v. Village of Mountain Iron 26 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1946
  • Squillace v. Village of Mountain Iron 26 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1946
    At the outset, the rule is well established that the view of the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff must be accepted (Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. [2d] 329), and that such evidence must be given the benefit of all reasonable inferences.
  • Jenkins v. Jenkins 19 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1945
  • Jenkins v. Jenkins 19 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1945
    Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Greene v. Mathiowetz, 212 Minn. 171 , 3 N. W. (2d) 97 ; Hubred v. Wagner, 217 Minn. 129 , 14 N. W. (2d) 115 ; Donea v. Massachusetts Mut.
  • Ranum v. Swenson 19 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1945
  • Ranum v. Swenson 19 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1945
    here involved, the defense of contributory negligence is not effective as against him.” 2 “* * * Whether the time ever came when it might be said that plaintiff should have realized that defendant was not going to seasonably yield the right of way and that an accident was imminent was * * a question of fact and not one of law.” Olson v. Byam, 176 Minn. 619, 620 , ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Landeen v. Dejung 17 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1945
  • Landeen v. Dejung 17 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1945
    Kane v. Locke, supra; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 57 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329, 335 ; Brown v. Knutson, 179 Minn. 123 , .
  • Travis v. Collett 16 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1944
  • Travis v. Collett 16 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1944
    Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
  • James v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1944
  • James v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1944
    Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Schnore v. Baldwin 14 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1944
  • Schnore v. Baldwin 14 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1944
    30 (§ 2720-151 [29]), as follows: “Every way or place in private ownership and used for vehicular travel by the owner and those having express or implied permission from the owner, but not by other persons.” The foregoing statutes have been construed by this court in Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 51 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329, 333 , where it was stated: “It seems agreed that the test to be used in determining whether *397 a given roadway is public or private does not turn upon the amount of travel or
  • Kayser v. Jungbauer 14 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1944
  • Kayser v. Jungbauer 14 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1944
    Thus, it does not come within the statutory definition of a public “street or highway” (Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. [2d] 329), and § 170.04 (§ 2720-104) does not apply.
  • Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of Taxation 14 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1944
  • Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of Taxation 14 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1944
    Mattson v. Flynn, 216 Minn. 354 , 13 N. W. (2d) 11 ; Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Kane v. Locke 12 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1943
  • Warren v. Marsh 11 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1943