DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eklund v. Kapetas, 11 N.W.2d 805.

26 citing documents.

  • Mourning v. Interlachen Country Club 158 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1968
  • Mourning v. Interlachen Country Club 158 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1968
    They also contend she was a business visitor, citing Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N. W. (2d) 247 ; Meyer v. Mitchell, 248 Minn. 397 , 80 N. W. (2d) 450 ; and Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 .
  • Hill v. Gaertner 92 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1958
  • Hill v. Gaertner 92 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1958
    1 Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; Anderson v. Hegna, 212 Minn. 147 , 2 N. W. (2d) 820 .
  • Flynn v. Arcade Investment Co. 91 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1958
  • Flynn v. Arcade Investment Co. 91 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1958
    Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 .
  • Harris v. Campbell Cereal Co. 67 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1954
  • Harris v. Campbell Cereal Co. 67 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1954
    See, Johnson v. Brand Stores, Inc., supra; Duffy v. Stratton, supra; Ober v. The Golden Rule, supra; Folsom v. Hojny, 223 Minn. 223 , 26 N. W. (2d) 219; Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79, 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; Landy v. Olson & Serley Sash & Door Co. 171 Minn. 440 , .
  • Bielinski v. Colwell 65 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1954
  • Bielinski v. Colwell 65 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1954
    Sanders v. Gilbertson, 224 Minn. 546 , 29 N. W. (2d) 357 ; Shockman v. Union Transfer Co. 220 Minn. 334 , 19 N. W. (2d) 812 ; Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; Walker v. Stecher, 219 Minn. 152 , 17 N. W. (2d) 317 ; Packar v. Brooks, 211 Minn. 99 , .
  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
    Co. 236 Minn. 86 , 51 N. W. (2d) 839 ; Sorlie v. Thomas, 235 Minn. 509 , 51 N. W. (2d) 592 ; Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; 10 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Austin v. Rosecke 61 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1953
  • Austin v. Rosecke 61 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1953
    Co. 236 Minn. 86 , 51 N. W. (2d) 839 ; Sorlie v. Thomas, 235 Minn. 509 , 51 N. W. (2d) 592 ; Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Schrader v. Kriesel 45 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1950
  • Schrader v. Kriesel 45 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1950
    8 Johnson v. Evanski, 221 Minn. 323, 327 , 22 N. W. (2d) 213, 215 ; Goldfine v. Johnson, 208 Minn. 449 , ; Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; Clark v. C. & N. W. Ry.
  • Peterson v. Jewel Tea Co. Inc. 38 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1949
  • Peterson v. Jewel Tea Co. Inc. 38 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1949
    Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 ; Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; Mardorf v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 194 Minn. 537 , ; see, 3 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Folsom v. Hojny 26 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1947
  • Folsom v. Hojny 26 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1947
    In Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 87 , , 809 , where we also held the issue of contributory negligence was a fact question, we said: "* * * Plaintiff had never before been in defendant's restaurant.
  • Johnson v. Evanski 22 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1946
  • Johnson v. Evanski 22 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1946
    4 See, Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; Dunham v. Hubert W. White, Inc. 203 Minn. 82 , ; Albachten v. The Golden Rule, 135 Minn. 381 , ; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 17 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1944
  • Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 17 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1944
    Co. 209 Minn. 230 , ; Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 .
  • Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 15 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1944
  • Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 15 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1944
    & Supp. § 5082; Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; Mardorf v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 194 Minn. 537 , .