Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kelly, 15 N.W.2d 554.

40 citing documents.

Peter J. Kaniowsky v. the Pima County Consolidated Justice Court The Hon. Maria L. Felix 371 P.3d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Hagen v. Schirmers 783 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Appellants cite to State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247, 254 , which held that a statutory presumption is invalid if applied in either a civil or criminal proceeding, unless there is a logical connection between the proven fact and the presumed fact.
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Appellants cite to State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247, 254 , which held that a statutory presumption is invalid if applied in either a civil or criminal proceeding, unless there is a logical connection between the proven fact and the presumed fact.
State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
see also State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247, 257
Baker v. State 590 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1999
Baker v. State 590 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1999
State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247, 266 , (emphasis added).
State v. Clausen 493 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1992
State v. Clausen 493 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1992
State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247, 250
State v. Russell 477 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1991
State v. Russell 477 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1991
State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247, 250
State v. Eli 402 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Eli 402 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
At oral argument Eli asserted that State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , applied to the present case.
Nevins v. Christopher Street, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nevins v. Christopher Street, Inc. 363 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
772 (1932) (conclusive presumption that gifts made within two years prior to death were made in contemplation of death); see also State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , (statute providing that finding of intoxicating liquor in possession of any person shall be prima facie evidence of possession with intent to sell).
State v. Reps 223 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1974
State v. Reps 223 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1974
In State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247, 261 , , 162 A. L. R. 477, 487 (1944), this court stated: “While we cannot subscribe to the view that all statutes creating presumptions or prima facie proof to apply in criminal prosecutions are invalid as depriving the defendant of the presumption of innocence, the right to a jury trial, or othe
State v. Kalvig 209 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1973
State v. Siirila 193 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 1971
State v. Miller 185 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1971
State v. Miller 185 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1971
See, also, State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554 .
Twin City Candy and Tobacco Co. v. A. Weisman Co. 149 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1967
Twin City Candy and Tobacco Co. v. A. Weisman Co. 149 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1967
Geiselhart v. Tahash, 274 Minn. 464 , 144 N. W. (2d) 354 ; State v. Edwards, 269 Minn. 343, 348 , 130 N. W. (2d) 623, 626 ; State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554 , 162 A. L. R. 477; United States v. Romano, 382 U. S. 136 , 86 S. Ct. 279 , 15 L. ed. (2d) 210; Tot v. United States, 319 U. S. 463, 469 , 63 S. Ct. 1241, 1245 , 87 L. ed. 1519, 1525; Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. Ervin (D. Minn.) 23 F. Supp. 70, 82 ; Mott’s Super Markets, Inc. v. Frassinelli, 148
State v. Mathiasen 141 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1966
State v. Mathiasen 141 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1966
Illustrative of this judicial function with respect to such legislative authority are decisions to the effect that it is within the legislative province to declare that certain acts may constitute or be parts of different offenses, State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554 , 162 A. L. R. 477; State v. Dineen, 10 Minn. 325 (407); that the same acts may be offenses under different statutes, State v. Bolsinger, 221 Minn. 154 , 21 N. W. (2d) 480 ; that it is not a defense to prosecution unde
State v. Edwards 130 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1964
State v. Edwards 130 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1964
3 The term is discussed in the Minnesota decision *347 of State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554 , 162 A. L. R. 477.
State v. Rasmussen 118 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1962
State v. Rasmussen 118 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1962
That the sentence prescribed by statute determines the grade or class of the crime to which the statute has reference is borne out by this court’s decision in State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247, 266 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554, 564 , 162 A. L. R. 477, wherein it was stated: “Statutory nomenclature does not necessarily determine the grade or class of a crime.
State v. Moseng 95 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1959
State v. Moseng 95 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1959
Also see, United States v. Lacher, 134 U. S. 624 , 10 S. Ct. 625 , 33 L. ed. 1080; State v. Hayes, 244 Minn. 296 , 70 N. W. (2d) 110 ; State v. Evans, 154 Minn. 95 , , 27 A. L. R. 1165; State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554 , 162 A. L. R. 477, with Annotation at 495; 50 Am.
State v. Masteller 45 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1950
State v. Masteller 45 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1950
Every other crime is a gross misdemeanor.” In State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247, 266 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554, 564 , 162 A. L. R. 477, we said: “Statutory nomenclature does not necessarily determine the grade or class of a crime.
State v. Wilson 21 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1946
State v. Wilson 21 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1946
Cases like State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554 , and Chappell v. State, 197 Ind.
City of Duluth v. Cerveny 16 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1944
City of Duluth v. Cerveny 16 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1944
See, also, State v. Kelly, 218 Minn. 247 , 15 N. W. (2d) 554 .