Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co., 16 N.W.2d 553.

27 citing documents.

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of Hewitt 143 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1966
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of Hewitt 143 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1966
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 , we said that inasmuch as a violation of our traffic regulations is declared by statute to be prima facie evidence *258 of negligence only, it is not such an intentional act as to bar contributory negligence as a defense.
Petron v. Waldo 139 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Petron v. Waldo 139 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 , this court construed the predecessor of this provision (Minn. St.
Randall v. Village of Excelsior 103 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1960
Randall v. Village of Excelsior 103 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1960
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 .
Hondl v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 82 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1957
Butler v. Engel 68 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1954
Butler v. Engel 68 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1954
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 ; 19 Minn. L. Rev. 686 .
Simon v. Carroll 62 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1954
Simon v. Carroll 62 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1954
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 .
McGuiggan v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 40 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1949
McGuiggan v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 40 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1949
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 558 , and others of similar import, relied upon by plaintiff, are not in point here.
Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 36 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1949
Barrett v. Nash Finch Co. 36 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1949
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. [2d] 553; Hanson v. Hall, 202 Minn. 381 , ), or a ground for the recovery of a penalty (Mayes v. Byers, 214 Minn. 54 , 7 N. W. [2d] 403, 144 A. S. R. 821).
Rue v. Wendland 33 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1948
Rue v. Wendland 33 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1948
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 .
Spartz v. Krebsbach 31 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1948
Spartz v. Krebsbach 31 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1948
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 , is not applicable.
Mlenek v. Fleming 27 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1947
Mlenek v. Fleming 27 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1947
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 .
Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 27 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1947
Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 27 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1947
Co. 218 Minn. 488, 494 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553, 556 , where we held that “Where injury is sustained as the result of intentional obstruction of a highway in violation of the statute, the contributory negligence of the person injured is no defense,” citing Hanson v. Hall, 202 Minn. 381 , .
Hahn v. Diamond Iron Works, Inc. 20 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1945
Hahn v. Diamond Iron Works, Inc. 20 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1945
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 , where causal connection was shown.
Medved v. Doolittle 19 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1945
Medved v. Doolittle 19 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1945
Co. 218 Minn. 488 , 16 N. W. (2d) 553 ; Lundstrom v. Giacomo, 194 Minn. 624 , ; Lind v. G. N. Ry.