Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Monaghan v. Armatage, 15 N.W.2d 241.

25 citing documents.

Graco, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 925 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
County of Freeborn v. Bryson 210 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1973
County of Freeborn v. Bryson 210 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1973
Cf. Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108 , appeal dismissed, 323 U. S. 681 , 65 S. Ct. 436 , 89 L. ed. 552 (1945).
Kronschnabel v. City of Saint Paul 137 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1965
Kronschnabel v. City of Saint Paul 137 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 1965
The nature of the city and state relationship is fully discussed in our decisions of Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108 , 15 N. W. (2d) 241 , and Town of Bridgie v. County of Koochiching, 227 Minn. 320 , 35 N. W. (2d) 537 .
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
17 See, Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108 , 15 N. W. (2d) 241 .
State Ex Rel. Anoka County Airport Protest Committee v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission 78 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1956
State Ex Rel. Anoka County Airport Protest Committee v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission 78 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1956
In Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108 , 15 N. W. (2d) 241 , we held that the act was not special legislation in violation of Minn. Const, art, 4, §§ 38 and 34, and that it did not violate U. S. Const. Amend.
State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
1917F, 1050 ; Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108 , 15 N.W.
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
“* * * Absent constitutional restriction, the legislature may at its pleasure modify or withdraw any powers so entrusted to a city, hold such powers itself, or vest them in other agencies.” Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108, 112 , 15 N. W. (2d) 241, 243 .
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
In Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108, 112 , 15 N. W. (2d) 241, 243 , this court said: “* * * Absent constitutional restriction, the legislature may at its pleasure modify or withdraw any powers so entrusted to a city, hold such powers itself, or vest them in other agencies.
Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of Minneapolis 40 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1949
Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of Minneapolis 40 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1949
Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108, 112 , 15 N. W. (2d) 241, 243 .
Town of Bridgie v. County of Koochiching 35 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1948
Town of Bridgie v. County of Koochiching 35 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1948
Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108 , 15 N. W. (2d) 241 ; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
Ramaley v. City of St. Paul 33 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1948
Ramaley v. City of St. Paul 33 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1948
Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108 , 15 N. W. (2d) 241 .
State ex rel. Interstate Air-Parts, Inc. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission 25 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1947
State Ex Rel. Interstate, Etc. v. M.-St. P. M. A. 25 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1947
State ex rel. Interstate Air-Parts, Inc. v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission 25 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1947
The purposes of the statute and of the commission are fully stated in Erickson v. King, 218 Minn. 98 , 15 N. W. (2d) 201 , and Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108 , 15 N. W. (2d) 241 , where the provisions of the statute were set forth and its constitutionality was sustained.
State Ex Rel. Interstate, Etc. v. M.-St. P. M. A. 25 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1947
The purposes of the statute and of the commission are fully stated in Erickson v. King, 218 Minn. 98 , , and Monaghan v. Armatage, 218 Minn. 108 , , where the provisions of the statute were set forth and its constitutionality was sustained.