Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Coduti v. Hauser, 17 N.W.2d 504.

35 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. E. R. and W. G. R., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Coduti v. Hauser , 219 Minn. 297, 303
State of Minnesota v. T. J. Z. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. T. J. Z. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 303, -08 (1945).
Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 303 , -08 (1945) (stating that a correction to a law “must be done by amendment rather than construction, there being no ambiguity in the later law”); see also Minn.Stat.
Amcon Block & Precast, Inc. v. Suess 794 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Amcon Block & Precast, Inc. v. Suess 794 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 303 , -08 (1945) (“[Any correction to an injustice in the law] must be done by amendment rather than construction, there being no ambiguity in the later law.” (Quotation omitted.)).
T.E.S. Construction, Inc. v. Chicilo 784 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
T.E.S. Construction, Inc. v. Chicilo 784 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 303 , -08 (1945) (“The Legislature is at liberty to ignore logic and perpetrate injustice so long as it does not transgress constitutional limits.
Northern States Power Company v. MINNESOTA METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 684 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2004
Northern States Power Company v. MINNESOTA METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 684 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2004
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 302 , and (3) that there is no other adequate legal remedy.
Chenoweth v. City of New Brighton 655 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 301-03 , -08 *342 (1945) (stating both that legislature may ignore logic and perpetrate injustice as long as it does not violate constitution and that, absent ambiguity, any remedy for suspect statute must be by amendment and not construction).
Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 638 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 638 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 303 , -08 (1945); see also Dohney, d at 606 (noting that the supreme court is “hesitant to judicially alter the UIM procedures established by the legislature and in the process possibly adversely *479 affect the delicate balance between the rights of UIM insureds and UIM insurers”).
Michels v. Kozitza 610 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Michels v. Kozitza 610 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 303 , -08 (1945) (observing legislature may ignore logic and perpetrate injustice as long as it does not violate constitution; absent ambiguity, remedy must be by amendment and not construction).
In Re the Fairview-University Medical Center 590 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Fairview-University Medical Center 590 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 303 , -08 (1945) (quoting State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Laux v. Gallagher 527 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State Ex Rel. Laux v. Gallagher 527 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 305
Coyle v. City of Delano 526 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Coyle v. City of Delano 526 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 302 , (quoting State ex rel.
County of Swift v. Boyle 481 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
County of Swift v. Boyle 481 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 302 , (citation omitted) (emphasis added).
International Union of Operating Engineers v. Minneapolis Civil Service Commission 409 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
International Union of Operating Engineers v. Minneapolis Civil Service Commission 409 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297, 303
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 363 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 363 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297 , , holds: “ ‘The rules of the Commission, having all the force and effect of statutory law, should be sustained unless they violate constitutional guaranties, controlling state legislation or the provisions of the [Minneapolis home-rule] charter pursuant to which they were adopted.’ ” Carter v. Gal
Anderson v. City of St. Paul 241 N.W.2d 86 Minn. 1976
City of New Brighton v. Metropolitan Council 237 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1975
City of New Brighton v. Metropolitan Council 237 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1975
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297 , involved a decision by the Minneapolis Civil Service Commission regarding restoration of an employee after a leave of absence.
Starkweather v. Blair 71 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1955
Starkweather v. Blair 71 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1955
Coduti v. Hauser, 219 Minn. 297 , 17 N. W. (2d) 504 , apparently in support of his position that this act is an ex post facto law.