Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite First & American National Bank v. Andrews, 17 N.W.2d 656.

14 citing documents.

In re: Sidney A. Goodman Revocable Trust, U/A/D December 16, 1985 as Amended Minn. Ct. App. 2018
depends upon the circumstances of the particular case, and is ordinarily a question of fact.” In re Comstock’s Will, 219 Minn. 325, 336, .
In Re: Amendment and Restatement of Revocable Living Trust of Alfred J. Berget dated February 15, 2005. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In a fixed deferred annuity, the 1 Before the enactment of this statute, a trustee was required by the common law, and later by statute, to “employ such diligence and such prudence in the care and management, as in general, prudent men of discretion and intelligence in such matters, employ in their own like affairs.” In re Comstock’s Will, 219 Minn. 325, 332, see also Minn. Stat. § 501B.10, subd.
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams 631 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
The district court concluded that Minnesota courts have the discretion to allow or deny compensation to the trustee but that “in the event of fraud, bad faith, or inexcusable negligence, the court must deny an award of trustee fees,” citing In re Trust of Cornstock, 219 Minn. 325 , and its progeny.
In Re the Trusteeship Created by the Sheridan 593 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Trust Agreement of Julius F. Seeman, 841 P.2d 403, 405 (Colo.Ct.App.1992); accord In re Comstock’s Will, 219 Minn. 325, 340
In Re the Trusteeship of Williams 591 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In In re Will of Comstock, 219 Minn. 325 , and Fortune, 200 Minn. at 367 , 274 N.W.
In re the Trust of Brown 380 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In In re Comstock’s Will, 219 Minn. 325 , the court stated: [W]e are to be guided by the well-known principle that the entire instrument must be considered, “aided by the surrounding circumstances, due weight being given to all its language, with some meaning being given, if possible, to all parts, expressions and words used, discarding
In Re the Trusts Created Under the Will of Dwan 371 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Comstock’s Will, 219 Minn. 325, 339
State Bank & Trust Co. v. Melzark 305 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1981
See also, e. g., In re Trust Under Will of Comstock, 219 Minn. 325 , 337, , 663 (1945); In re Trusts Under Will of McCann, 212 Minn. 233 , 241, , 231 (1942).
Matter of Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust, Etc. 305 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 1981
See also, e. g., In re Trust Under Will of Comstock, 219 Minn. 325 , 337, , 663 (1945); In re Trusts Under Will of McCann, 212 Minn. 233 , 241, , 231 (1942).
Fred O. Watson Co. v. United States Life Insurance Co. of New York 258 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1977
E. g., In re Trust Under Will of Comstock, 219 Minn. 325, 339
Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 235 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1975
See, e. g., In re Trust Created Under Will of Freeman, 247 Minn. 50 , 75 N. W. *431 2d 906 (1956); In re Trust Under Will of Comstock, 219 Minn. 325 , In re Living Trust Created by Atwood, 227 Minn. 495
St. Paul Electrical Workers Welfare Fund v. Cartier 167 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1969
This is an important consideration, as we indicated in In re Trust Under Will of Comstock, 219 Minn. 325 , 17 N. W. (2d) 656 ; but it is not necessarily decisive, as we indicated with respect to the somewhat analogous situation of a stockholder’s derivative suit in Bosch v. Meeker Co-op.
First Trust Co. v. Cochrane 61 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1953
See, In re Trust Under Will of Comstock, 219 Minn. 325 , 17 N. W. (2d) 656 ; In re Trust Created by Watland, 211 Minn. 84 , ; In re Trusteeship Created Under Will of Ordean, 195 Minn. 120 , .
In Re Trust Under Will of Comstock 17 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1945