Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Haney, 18 N.W.2d 315.

50 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Sherwin Jerome Thurman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Sherwin Jerome Thurman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518, 520
State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
403; see also State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518, 520 , (“In the discretion of the trial court, as an exception to the rule, evidence as to independent and disconnected acts may be received for the specific purpose of affecting the credibility of the accused if its effect upon credibility is not too remote or if its probative value is not o
State v. Fallin 540 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1995
State v. Fallin 540 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1995
See State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518, 520 , ” Minn.R.Evid.
State v. Jahnke 353 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Jahnke 353 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , Thompson, Evidence, § 608.01 (1979).
State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , see Minn.R.Evid.
Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
State v. Gavle, 234 Minn. 186, 208 , *628 State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518, 520
State v. Vance 254 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1977
State v. Vance 254 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1977
State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518
State v. Martin 197 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1972
State v. Martin 197 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1972
See, State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .” See, also, State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , *128 (1965); State v. Huffstutter, 269 Minn. 153 , State v. Currie, 267 Minn. 294
State v. Olson 156 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1968
State v. Olson 156 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1968
1 State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , 139 N. W. (2d) 167 .
State v. Drews 144 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1966
State v. Drews 144 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1966
The application of this rule was discussed in State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 .
State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
State v. Spreigl 139 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 1965
7 State v. Rutledge, 142 Minn. 117, 118 , State v. Friend, 151 Minn. 138, 139 , ; State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 .
State v. Norgaard 136 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1965
State v. Norgaard 136 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1965
State v. Sanderson, 179 Minn. 436 , *52 ; State v. Glazer, 176 Minn. 442 , ; State v. Silvers, 230 Minn. 12 , 40 N. W. (2d) 630 ; State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 .
State v. Hines 133 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1964
State v. Hines 133 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1964
11 State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. Friend, 151 Minn. 138 , .
State v. Zecher 128 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1964
State v. Zecher 128 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1964
State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; Fisher v. Weinholzer, 91 Minn. 22 , .
State v. Currie 126 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1964
State v. Currie 126 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1964
3 State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. Gress, 250 Minn. 337 , 84 N. W. (2d) 616 .
State v. Wofford 114 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1962
State v. Wofford 114 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1962
See, State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .” It is well recognized that the rule excluding evidence of the commission of other offenses does not necessarily deprive the state of the right to make out its whole case against the accused on any evidence which is otherwise relevant upon the i
State v. Beltowski 98 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1959
State v. Beltowski 98 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1959
Dehning v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 120 , 86 N. W. (2d) 723 ; State v. Gress, 250 Minn. 337 , 84 N. W. (2d) 616 ; State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; and Mallory v. United States, 354 U. S. 449 , 77 S. Ct. 1356 , 1 L. ed. (2d) 1479.
State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
See, State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. DePauw, 246 Minn. 91 , 74 N. W. (2d) 297 .
State v. DePauw 74 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1955
State v. DePauw 74 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1955
See, State v. Schueller, 120 Minn. 26, 29 , ; State v. Shtemme, 133 Minn. 184, 186 , ; State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. Monroe, 142 Minn. 394, 398 , ; State v. Ettenberg, 145 Minn. 39, 43 , ; State v. Yurkiewicz, 212 Minn. 208, 210, 211 , 3 N. W. (2d) 775, 776 ; State v. Hacker, 153 Minn. 538 , ; State v. Friedman, 146 Minn. 373 , , rehearin
State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
(2d) 585 ; State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N.W.
City of St. Paul v. Greene 56 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1952
City of St. Paul v. Greene 56 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1952
5 Compare, for instance, Luley v. Luley, supra, with State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; or State v. Doty, 167 Minn. 164 , .
Luley v. Luley 48 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1951
Luley v. Luley 48 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1951
2 See, State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 , in re evidence which is relevant to the offense in issue but which incidentally discloses other crimes; 20 Am.
State v. Gavle 48 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1951
State v. Gavle 48 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1951
State v. Voss, 192 Minn. 127 , ; State v. Duffy, 179 Minn. 439 , ; see, State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518, 520 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315, 316 .
State v. Silvers 40 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1950
State v. Silvers 40 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1950
State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 ; State v. Glazer, 176 Minn. 442 , .
State v. Haney 23 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1946
State v. Haney 23 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1946
Our opinion on the first appeal is reported in State v. Haney, 219 Minn. 518 , 18 N. W. (2d) 315 .