Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubenette v. Ostby, 6 N.W.2d 637.
- opc7021302-040103.pdf Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
opc7021302-040103.pdf
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349, 349-53, -39 (1942).
- Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n
834 N.W.2d 527
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
at 246 (citing Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349, 349-53 , -39 (1942)).
- Stelter v. Chiquita Processed Foods, L.L.C. 658 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Stelter v. Chiquita Processed Foods, L.L.C.
658 N.W.2d 242
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349, 349-53 , -39 (1942).
- Stenzel v. Bach 203 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1973
-
Stenzel v. Bach
203 N.W.2d 819
Minn. 1973
Tatro v. Carlson, 271 Minn. 536 , Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349
- Springrose v. Willmore 192 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1971
-
Springrose v. Willmore
192 N.W.2d 826
Minn. 1971
This marks, as in the case at bar, merely a return to the earlier expression of Mr. Chief Justice Henry M. Gallagher in Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349, 351 , that “[s]uch assumption of risk is but a phase of contributory negligence.” We had an opportunity in Parness v. Economics Laboratory, Inc. 284 Minn. 381 , to follow the lead of Meistrich in abolishing assumption of risk as a separate and distinct defense.
- Parness v. Economics Laboratory, Inc. 170 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1969
-
Parness v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.
170 N.W.2d 554
Minn. 1969
See, also, Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 .
- Muckler v. Buchl 150 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
-
Muckler v. Buchl
150 N.W.2d 689
Minn. 1967
7 See, Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Johnson v. Evanski, 221 Minn. 323 , 22 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Grabow v. Hanson, 226 Minn. 265 , 32 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Schrader v. Kriesel, 232 Minn. 238 , 45 N. W. (2d) 395 ; Standafer v. First Nat.
- Spafford v. Hahn 143 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1966
-
Spafford v. Hahn
143 N.W.2d 81
Minn. 1966
As said in Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349, 350 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 , 638: “ ‘In the ordinary personal injury action, where plaintiff puts himself in a position to encounter known hazards which the ordinarily prudent person would not do, he assumes the risk of injury therefrom.
- Tatro v. Carlson 137 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1965
-
Tatro v. Carlson
137 N.W.2d 187
Minn. 1965
In Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 , defendant Ostby had during the day persistently driven at speeds as high as 75 or 80 miles per hour over repeated protests by plaintiffs, who sought damages for injuries suffered in a collision between Ostby’s automobile, in which they were riding, and one operated by another defendant.
- Rahja v. Current 119 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1963
-
Rahja v. Current
119 N.W.2d 699
Minn. 1963
2 Rutz v. Iacono, 229 Minn. 591 , 40 N. W. (2d) 892 ; Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 .
- Sackett v. Haeckel 81 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1957
-
Sackett v. Haeckel
81 N.W.2d 833
Minn. 1957
The case of Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 , is cited by the Schafer estate.
- Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
-
Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co.
63 N.W.2d 380
Minn. 1954
Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 .
- Swenson v. Slawik 53 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1952
-
Swenson v. Slawik
53 N.W.2d 107
Minn. 1952
Schrader v. Kriesel, 232 Minn. 238 , 45 N. W. (2d) 395 ; Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 .
- Schrader v. Kriesel 45 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1950
-
Schrader v. Kriesel
45 N.W.2d 395
Minn. 1950
In the case of Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349, 350 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 , this court held that— "where plaintiff puts himself in a position to encounter known hazards which the ordinarily prudent person would not do, he assumes the risk of injury therefrom.
- Grabow v. Hanson 32 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1948
-
Grabow v. Hanson
32 N.W.2d 593
Minn. 1948
See, also, Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Schroepfer v. City of Sleepy Eye, 215 Minn. 525 , 10 N. W. (2d) 398 ; Mosheuvel v. District of Columbia, 191 U. S. 247 , 24 S. Ct. 57 , 48 L. ed. 170; H. E. & W. T. Ry.
- Kapla v. Lehti 30 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1948
-
Kapla v. Lehti
30 N.W.2d 685
Minn. 1948
*333 Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 , and Farnham v. Pepper, 193 Minn. 222 , , cited by appellant, are not in point.
- Kordiak v. Holmgren 30 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1947
-
Kordiak v. Holmgren
30 N.W.2d 16
Minn. 1947
A ‘correct statement is that the plaintiff’s negligence, to prevent a recovery, must contribute proximately to the injury as a cause.’ * * * The question is not as to the amount of a plaintiff’s negligence, if any, but whether, if present at all, it contributed as a cause proximately to the result.” Defendants rely upon Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 .
- Johnson v. Evanski 22 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1946
-
Johnson v. Evanski
22 N.W.2d 213
Minn. 1946
In Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349, 350 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 , we said: “In the ordinary personal injury action, where plaintiff puts himself in a position to encounter known hazards which the ordinarily prudent person would not do, he assumes the risk of injury therefrom.
- Landru v. Stensrud 17 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 1945
-
Landru v. Stensrud
17 N.W.2d 322
Minn. 1945
As said in Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349, 350 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 , 638: “In the ordinary personal injury action, where plaintiff puts himself in a position to encounter known hazards which the ordinarily prudent person would not do, he assumes the risk of injury therefrom.
- Wilson v. Davidson 17 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1944
-
Wilson v. Davidson
17 N.W.2d 31
Minn. 1944
Hu-benette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637 .
- Schroepfer v. City of Sleepy Eye 10 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1943
-
Schroepfer v. City of Sleepy Eye
10 N.W.2d 398
Minn. 1943
In this the trial court was of the opinion expressed by us recently in Hubenette v. Ostby, 213 Minn. 349, 350 , 6 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 , where we said: “In the ordinary personal injury action, where plaintiff puts himself in a position to encounter known hazards which the ordinarily prudent person would not do, he assumes the risk of injury therefrom.