DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc., 10 N.W.2d 406.

144 citing documents.

  • Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
  • Followed Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945, to return a verdict in favor of Mr. Greenberg for the damages to his vehicle.
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945; Restatement, Torts, § 489; Prosser, Torts, § 55.
  • Lunderberg v. Bierman 63 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1954
  • Lunderberg v. Bierman 63 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1954
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945, we held that the contributory negligence of a bailee driver is not imputable to the bailor under the above statute in an action by the bailor against a third party involved in the accident.
  • Ryan v. Griffin 62 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1954
  • Ryan v. Griffin 62 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1954
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945; Nees v. Minneapolis St.
  • American Automobile Insurance v. Molling 57 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1953
  • American Automobile Insurance v. Molling 57 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1953
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945.
  • Hatley v. Klingsheim 53 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1952
  • Hatley v. Klingsheim 53 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1952
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945, respecting the right of Mr. Hatley to recover for damages to his automobile, even though the jury should find that Mrs. Hatley was guilty of contributory negligence.
  • Tschida v. Dorle 51 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1952
  • Tschida v. Dorle 51 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1952
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945.
  • Frankle v. Twedt 47 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1951
  • Frankle v. Twedt 47 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1951
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 .
  • Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co. 47 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1951
  • Rogge v. Great Northern Railway Co. 47 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1951
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394, 407 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406, 414 , 147 A. L. R. 945; Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201, 209 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711, 716 .
  • Chevalier v. Rogers 41 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1950
  • Chevalier v. Rogers 41 N.W.2d 872 Minn. 1950
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394, 399 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406, 410 , 147 A. L. R. 945, where there was a general verdict for defendant, with the addition “by reason of the fact that both the defendant and plaintiff were negligent.” We there said, in stating the facts, that the quoted addition should be rejected as surplusage and the general verdict shoul
  • Benson v. Hoenig 37 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1949
  • Benson v. Hoenig 37 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1949
    Co. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945.
  • Jacobsen v. Dailey 36 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1949
  • Ellingboe v. Guerin 36 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1949
  • Jacobsen v. Dailey 36 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1949
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394, 408 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406, 415 , 147 A. L. R. 945, this court thoroughly considered § 170.54 (Minn. St.
  • Ellingboe v. Guerin 36 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1949
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945, and Nash v. Lang, 268 Mass. 407 , 167 N. E. 762 , referred to and approved in the Christensen case, and stated that his order was based on these cases.
  • Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 31 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 1948
  • Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 31 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 1948
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 ; Donahue v. Mazzoli, 27 Cal.
  • Medved v. Doolittle 19 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1945
  • Medved v. Doolittle 19 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1945
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. [2d] 106, 147 A. L. R. 945).
  • Landeen v. Dejung 17 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1945
  • Landeen v. Dejung 17 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1945
    Co. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945.
  • Travis v. Collett 16 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1944
  • Travis v. Collett 16 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1944
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394, 395 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945.
  • Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1944
  • Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1944
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945.
  • Kane v. Locke 16 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1944
  • Kane v. Locke 16 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1944
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 , 147 A. L. R. 945.
  • Flitton v. Daleki 13 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1944
  • Flitton v. Daleki 13 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1944
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394, 399 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406, 410 , 147 A. L. R. 945, it is stated: “Where traffic is regulated by a ‘Stop-and-Go’ traffic control device * * *, it is the duty of the driver of a motor vehicle to be on the lookout for, to discover, and to obey implicitly traffic control signals.” In other words, he must be alert to notice
  • Kane v. Locke 12 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1943
  • Kane v. Locke 12 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 1943
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 .
  • State v. One Buick Sedan Automobile 12 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1943
  • State v. One Buick Sedan Automobile 12 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1943
    Co. Inc. 215 Minn. 394 , 10 N. W. (2d) 406 .