Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Merritt v. Stuve, 9 N.W.2d 329.

59 citing documents.

Warren v. Marsh 11 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1943
See also Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 50 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Tankar Gas, Inc. v. Lumbermen’s Mut.
Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc. 10 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1943
Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc. 10 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1943
Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 ; Smith v. Carlson, 209 Minn. 268 , , supra; Dahlstrom v. Hurtig, 209 Minn. 72 , .
Ickler v. Hilger 10 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1943
Followed Ickler v. Hilger 10 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1943
At the outset we follow the well recognized rule that the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as stated in our most recent decision of Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 57 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .
Bloomquist v. Thomas 9 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1943
Schendel v. Klein 9 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1943
Schendel v. Klein 9 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1943
Viewing the evidence, as we must, from the evidence most favorable to the verdict, we think that under the doctrine of our recent cases, the latest being Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 58 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329, 336 , the question was properly for the jury.
Followed Bloomquist v. Thomas 9 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1943
Merritt v. Stuve, 215 Minn. 44, 57 , 9 N. W. (2d) 329 .