Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Simms v. Fagan, 12 N.W.2d 783.

28 citing documents.

Charles Smida v. Isanti Pines Tree Farm, LLC, and third party v. John F. Vande Waa, third party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Charles Smida v. Isanti Pines Tree Farm, LLC, and third party v. John F. Vande Waa, third party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Simms v. William Simms Hardware, 216 Minn. 283, 293
State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 684 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
Lindberg v. Fasching 667 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Lindberg v. Fasching 667 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Simms v. William Simms Hardware, Inc., 216 Minn. 283, 293
State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 665 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 665 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Simms v. William Simms Hardware, Inc., 216 Minn. 283, 292
Pergament v. Loring Properties, Ltd. 586 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Pergament v. Loring Properties, Ltd. 586 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Simms v. Fagan, 216 Minn. 283, 291
Hickerson v. Bender 500 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hickerson v. Bender 500 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Simms v. William Simms Hardware, Inc., 216 Minn. 283, 293
Nolan v. Stuebner 429 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nolan v. Stuebner 429 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Simms v. Simms Hardware, 216 Minn. 283, 291
Richards Asphalt Co. v. Bunge Corp. 399 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Richards Asphalt Co. v. Bunge Corp. 399 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Simms v. William Simms Hardware, 216 Minn. 283, 291
Wojahn v. Johnson 297 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1980
Wojahn v. Johnson 297 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1980
See, e. g., Simms v. Fagan, 216 Minn. 283 , 289 90, , 786 87 (1943).
Chabot v. Paradise 272 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1978
Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
10 See, Engquist v. Wirtjes, 243 Minn. 502 , 68 N. W. (2d) 412 ; Simms v. Fagan, 216 Minn. 283 , 12 N. W. (2d) 783 .
United Parking Stations, Inc. v. Calvary Temple 101 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1960
United Parking Stations, Inc. v. Calvary Temple 101 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1960
Co. 129 Minn. 126 , ; Simms v. Fagan, 216 Minn. 283 , 12 N. W. (2d) 783 ; 3 Tiffany, Real Property (3 ed.) § 825; Annotation, 25 A. L. R. (2d) 1265.
Engquist v. Wirtjes 68 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1955
Engquist v. Wirtjes 68 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1955
While this court, in Simms v. Fagan, 216 Minn. 283 , 12 N. W. (2d) 783 , said that, because the establishment of a practical location by acquiescence rests upon the principle of estoppel, knowledge of the exact boundary line was necessary, 10 in Fishman v. Nielsen, 237 Minn. 1 , 53 N. W. (2d) 553 , we held that such knowledge was not a prerequisite.
Fishman v. Nielsen 53 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1952
Fishman v. Nielsen 53 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1952
To support this contention he relies on Simms v. Fagan, 216 Minn. 283 , 12 N. W. (2d) 783 .
Dittrich v. Ubl 13 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1944
Dittrich v. Ubl 13 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1944
Simms v. Fagan, 216 Minn. 283 , 12 N. W. (2d) 783 ; Sandretto v. Wahlsten, 124 Minn. 331 , .