Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reiter v. Porter, 13 N.W.2d 372.

28 citing documents.

Empire State Bank v. Varpness 395 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Empire State Bank v. Varpness 395 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
We have previously held that a trial court “should direct a verdict in favor of a party in whose favor the evidence overwhelmingly preponderates, though there is some evidence in favor of the adverse party.” (quoting Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479, 483-84 , ).
Blegen v. Monarch Life Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Blegen v. Monarch Life Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Directed Verdict Standard “[T]he court should direct a verdict in favor of a party in whose favor the evidence overwhelmingly preponderates, though there is some evidence in favor of the adverse party.” (quoting Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479, 483-84 , ).
Nelson v. Henning 354 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nelson v. Henning 354 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
directed verdict standard: “[T]he court should direct a verdict in favor of a party in whose favor the evidence overwhelmingly preponderates, though there is some evidence in favor of the adverse party.” Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479, 483-84
Keefer v. Al Johnson Construction Co. 193 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1971
Keefer v. Al Johnson Construction Co. 193 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1971
Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479
Tschannen ex rel. Tschannen v. Hillsheim 178 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1970
Tschannen ex rel. Tschannen v. Hillsheim 178 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1970
See, Johnson v. Moore, 275 Minn. 292 , 146 N. W. (2d) 599 ; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Larsen v. N. P. Ry.
Nelson v. Holand 139 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1965
Distinguished Nelson v. Holand 139 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1965
Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 , and Cofran v. Swanman, 225 Minn. 40 , 29 N. W. (2d) 448 , cited by appellant, are distinguishable on the facts.
Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
Co. 209 Minn. 230 , ; Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .
Kmetz v. Johnson 113 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1962
Kmetz v. Johnson 113 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1962
Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Cofran v. Swanman, 225 Minn. 40 , 29 N. W. (2d) 448 .
Jeske v. George R. Wolff Holding Co. 83 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1957
Jeske v. George R. Wolff Holding Co. 83 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1957
Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Giermann v. St.
Aasen v. Aasen 36 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1949
Aasen v. Aasen 36 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1949
This case does not fall within the doctrine of Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 18 N. W. (2d) 372 .
Melzer v. Snow 29 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1947
Melzer v. Snow 29 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1947
‘Facts, proved to the point of demonstration, control as against mere declarations of witnesses.’ ” And in Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479, 484 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372, 375 , this court said: “* * * ‘undisputed physical facts may show that an accident could not have happened as a plaintiff claims and that he has no cause of action,’ * * *63 "We are of the opinion that the facts in this case do not prove to the point of demonstration that the accident could n
Cofran v. Swanman 29 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1947
Cofran v. Swanman 29 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1947
Co. 42 Minn. 5 , ; Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Spensley v. Oliver I. Min.
Wilson v. Davidson 17 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1944
Wilson v. Davidson 17 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1944
Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Brulla v. Cassady, 206 Minn. 398 , .
Johnson v. Whitney 14 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1944
Johnson v. Whitney 14 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1944
1927, § 9495); Romann v. Bender, 190 Minn. 419 , ; Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479, 483 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372, 375 .