Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'n, 16 N.W.2d 313.

38 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake Swope Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Anthony Blake Swope Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Fund Ass’n, –16 (Minn. 1944) (holding that if the language of a contract is ambiguous, a court may resort to evaluating extrinsic evidence, including the parties’ acts in performance of the contract, to determine its meaning).
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc. 913 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 2018
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc. 913 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 2018
218 Minn. 369 , , 315 (1944).
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Fund Ass’n, 218 Minn. 369, 373-74, - 16 (1944).
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Delano Community Development Corp. 571 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1997
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Delano Community Development Corp. 571 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 1997
See Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass’n, 218 Minn. 369, 373-74 , -16 (1944).
Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co. v. Dahlen Transp., Inc., 281 Minn. 253, 259 , (quoting Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass’n, 218 Minn. 369, 373-74 , ).
Torgerson-Forstrom H.I. of Willmar, Inc. v. Olmsted Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 339 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1983
Torgerson-Forstrom H.I. of Willmar, Inc. v. Olmsted Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 339 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1983
See, Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass’n, 218 Minn. 369
Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp. 246 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1976
Rooney v. Dayton-Hudson Corp. 246 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1976
Such notice must be given notwithstanding any provisions in the contract to the contrary * * 2 The general rule is that “the construction of a writing which is unambiguous is for the court, particularly when the intention of the parties is to be gained wholly from the writing.” Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Assn. 218 Minn. 369, 373 , cited in Noreen v. Park Construction Co. 255 Minn. 187, 190
Clark v. Crossroads Center (Rochester), Inc. 172 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1969
Clark v. Crossroads Center (Rochester), Inc. 172 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1969
Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Assn. 218 Minn. 369 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313 ; McCormick, Evidence, § 219.
Stein v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 161 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1968
Transport Indemnity Co. v. Dahlen Transport, Inc. 161 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1968
Stein v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 161 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1968
Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Assn. 218 Minn. 369 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313 ; Minnesota Mutual Life Ins.
Transport Indemnity Co. v. Dahlen Transport, Inc. 161 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1968
In Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Assn. 218 Minn. 369, 373 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313, 315 , and again in Noreen v. Park Const. Co. 255 Minn. 187, 190 , 96 N. W. (2d) 33, 36 , we said: “The rule is well established that ordinarily the construction of a writing which is unambiguous is for the court, particularly when the intention of the parties is to be gained whólly from the w
Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd. 153 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd. 153 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1967
In Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Assn. 218 Minn. 369, 373 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313, 315 , this court said: “The rule is well established that ordinarily the construction of a writing which is unambiguous is for the court, particularly when the intention of the parties is to be gained wholly from the writing.
Koch v. Han-Shire Investments, Inc. 140 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1966
Koch v. Han-Shire Investments, Inc. 140 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1966
Effengham v. Pesch, 182 Minn. 586 , ; Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Assn. 218 Minn. 369 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313 ; Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co. 218 Minn. 411 , 16 N. W. (2d) 319 ; Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc. 256 Minn. 339 , 98 N. W. (2d) 257 ; Kastner v. Dalton Development, Inc. 265 Minn. 511 , 122 N. W. (2d) 183 ; 4 Williston, Contracts (3 ed.) § 623.
Larson v. City of Minneapolis 114 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1962
Larson v. City of Minneapolis 114 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1962
Investors Syndicate v. Baskerville Bros. Holding Co. 200 Minn. 461, 468 , ; Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc. 256 Minn. 339, 354 , 98 N. W. (2d) 257, 268 ; Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Assn. 218 Minn. 369, 374 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313, 315 .
Town & Country Shopping Center v. Swenson Furniture Co. 110 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1961
Town & Country Shopping Center v. Swenson Furniture Co. 110 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1961
Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Assn. 218 Minn. 369, 374 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313, 316 .
Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1959
Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1959
See, Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers R. F. Assn. 218 Minn. 369 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313 , and cases cited therein.
Noreen v. Park Construction Co. 96 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1959
Noreen v. Park Construction Co. 96 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1959
In Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Assn. 218 Minn. 369, 373 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313, 315 , we said: “The rule is well established that ordinarily the construction of a writing which is unambiguous is for the court, particularly when the intention of the parties is to be gained wholly from the writing.
McPeak v. Boker 53 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1952
McPeak v. Boker 53 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1952
2 See, e. g., Wiseth v. Goodridge Farmers E. & M. Co. 197 Minn. 261 , ; Hayday v. Hammermill Paper Co. 184 Minn. 8 , ; Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers R. F. Assn. 218 Minn. 369 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313 ; T. R. Foley Co. v. McKinley, 114 Minn. 271 , .
Wallace v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. 25 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1947
Wallace v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. 25 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1947
Trade Assn. 169 Minn. 140 , ; Mienes v. Lucker Sales Co. 188 Minn. 162 , ; Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers R. F. Assn. 218 Minn. 369 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313 ; 2 Dunnell, Dig.
Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co. 16 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1944
Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co. 16 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1944
Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers K. F. Assn. 218 Minn. 369 , 16 N. W. (2d) 313 .