Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 15 N.W.2d 487.
-
Eric John Blehr, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., (noting that allowance of expert -witness fees to prevailing party “was made by order of the [district] court .
- State v. Lopez-Solis 589 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Lopez-Solis
589 N.W.2d 290
Minn. 1999
Co., 218 Minn. 273, 286 , (allowing expert witness fees in civil case).
- Wohlfeil v. Murray MacHinery, Inc. 344 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Wohlfeil v. Murray MacHinery, Inc. 344 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Smith v. Rekucki 177 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1970
-
Smith v. Rekucki
177 N.W.2d 410
Minn. 1970
Co. 218 Minn. 273, 282 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487, 493 , the jury is still the tribunal to which questions of this kind are *155 submitted for determination.
- Levin v. the Paul Revere Life Ins. Co. 159 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 1968
-
Levin v. the Paul Revere Life Ins. Co.
159 N.W.2d 186
Minn. 1968
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 ; cf. Wolfangel v. Prudential Ins.
- Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
-
Backman v. Fitch
137 N.W.2d 574
Minn. 1965
Co. 218 Minn. 273, 282 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487, 493 .” As we have already noted, the jury’s verdict of $12,500 provided for all past medical, hospital, nursing, and related expense in treating Backman’s hip fracture, and allowed for the cost of future corrective surgery which might be expected in order to enable Backman to resume his usual
- Krueger v. Knutson 111 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1961
-
Krueger v. Knutson
111 N.W.2d 526
Minn. 1961
Co. 218 Minn. 273, 282 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487, 493 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 .
- Dornberg v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 91 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
-
Dornberg v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
91 N.W.2d 178
Minn. 1958
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 .” Contentions of defendant With reference to the impropriety of *61 permitting plaintiffs physician to express an opinion based in part on plaintiff’s narrative as to her past pain, suffering, and as to improvement after the first accident are governed by our recent decision in Peterson v. Richfie
- Hentges v. Schuttler 77 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1956
-
Hentges v. Schuttler
77 N.W.2d 743
Minn. 1956
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 .
- Berg v. Ullevig 70 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1955
-
Berg v. Ullevig
70 N.W.2d 133
Minn. 1955
Co. 218 Minn. 273, 282 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487, 493 .” Experts are therefore under our rules permitted to give their opinions upon the very issue which the jury will have to decide, but such opinions are not conclusive.
- Zuercher v. Northern Jobbing Co. 66 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1954
-
Zuercher v. Northern Jobbing Co.
66 N.W.2d 892
Minn. 1954
Co. 218 Minn. 273, 279 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487, 492 .
- Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
-
Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co.
63 N.W.2d 380
Minn. 1954
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 ; Kundiger v. Prudential Ins.
- Austin v. Rosecke 61 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1953
-
Austin v. Rosecke
61 N.W.2d 240
Minn. 1953
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 ; Kundiger v. Prudential Ins.
- Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 59 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1953
-
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn.
59 N.W.2d 883
Minn. 1953
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 187 .” 7 Applying these principles, we find that Dr. Urberg never ventured an opinion as to whether the blow did in fact aggravate decedent’s brain tumor.
- TePoel v. Larson 53 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1952
-
TePoel v. Larson
53 N.W.2d 468
Minn. 1952
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 , we held that where there is no substantial evidence to overcome the presumption it controls decision.
- Peterson v. Jewel Tea Co. Inc. 38 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1949
-
Peterson v. Jewel Tea Co. Inc.
38 N.W.2d 51
Minn. 1949
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 ; Eklund v. Kapetas, 216 Minn. 79 , 11 N. W. (2d) 805 ; Mardorf v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co. 194 Minn. 537 , ; see, 3 Dunnell, Dig.
- Squillace v. Village of Mountain Iron 26 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1946
-
Squillace v. Village of Mountain Iron
26 N.W.2d 197
Minn. 1946
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 .
- Hiber v. City of St. Paul 16 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1944
- Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 17 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1944
-
Hiber v. City of St. Paul
16 N.W.2d 878
Minn. 1944
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 187 .
-
Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
17 N.W.2d 49
Minn. 1944
Co. 218 Minn. 273 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487 .
- James v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 16 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1944
-
James v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
16 N.W.2d 188
Minn. 1944
Co. 218 Minn. 273, 282 , 15 N. W. (2d) 487, 493 .