Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 17 N.W.2d 49.

45 citing documents.

Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co. of Am., 219 Minn. 25, 28, (explaining that, “if there was expert testimony in support of plaintiff’s theory as well as defendant’s, the choice of which testimony to accept and which to reject was for the jury”).
Rud v. Flood 385 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Galante v. Oz, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Galante v. Oz, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 219 Minn. 25
In re the Welfare of L.P.C. 367 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re the Welfare of L.P.C. 367 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co., 219 Minn. 25, 29
Winge v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Company 201 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1972
Winge v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Company 201 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1972
Rehnke v. Jammes 168 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1969
Rehnke v. Jammes 168 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1969
Co. 219 Minn. 25, 29 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49, 52 , we held that without some supporting medical testimony a jury was not competent to decide whether the cause of death was trauma or disease, stating that the jury could not arbitrarily reject the unanimous opinion of qualified experts.
Stahlberg v. Moe 166 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1969
Stahlberg v. Moe 166 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1969
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 .
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; Hiber v. City of St.
Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; Spensley v. Oliver Iron Min.
McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; Applequist v. Oliver Iron Min.
Kmetz v. Johnson 113 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1962
Kmetz v. Johnson 113 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1962
Co. 219 Minn. 25, 29 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49, 52 , we dealt with the question of whether a jury must accept all or none of the testimony of certain expert witnesses and said: “* * * the jury was not required to accept or reject the testimony of each expert in toto; his testimony, like that of any other witness, could be believed in part an
McKenzie v. Siegel 112 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1961
McKenzie v. Siegel 112 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1961
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 , and cases cited.
Francis v. Anderson 95 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
Francis v. Anderson 95 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
Co. 219 Minn. 25, 28 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49, 51 , we said: “* * * The ‘test is not whether the court might in the exercise of *344 its discretion grant a new trial,’ but whether ‘it would be its manifest duty to set aside a contrary verdict.’ Applequist v. Oliver I. Min.
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; Applequist v. Oliver Iron Min.
Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
Penteluk v. Stark 69 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1955
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Jensen v. Dikel 69 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1955
Jensen v. Dikel 69 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1955
Co. 219 Minn. 25, 27 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49, 51 , we said that a motion for a directed verdict should not be granted— “unless there is complete absence of evidence reasonably sustaining plaintiff’s claim, or unless the evidence in support of his claim is wholly incredible and unworthy of belief or so conclusively overcome by other uneontr
Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; LaCombe v. Minneapolis St.
Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Austin v. Rosecke 61 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1953
Austin v. Rosecke 61 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1953
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; LaCombe v. Minneapolis St.
Van Tassel v. Patterson 50 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1951
Van Tassel v. Patterson 50 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1951
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 19 .
State v. Wagner 46 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1951
State v. Wagner 46 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1951
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 .
Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 46 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1951
Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 46 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1951
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; Applequist v. Oliver I. Min.
Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America 45 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1951
Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America 45 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1951
Co. 219 Minn. 25 , 17 N. W. (2d) 49 ; Applequist v. Oliver I. Min.