DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 18 N.W.2d 130.

31 citing documents.

  • Schroeder v. St. Louis County 708 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2006
  • Holmquist v. State 409 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Holmquist v. State 409 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    he court further stated: The rule which has emerged from our decision is “that if, by reason of peculiar facts or circumstances, a pitfall, trap, or snare dangerous to a traveler proceeding with reasonable care is created in respect to a street, a municipality owes a duty to exercise reasonable care to warn or otherwise protect such traveler from the resulting danger.” Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389, 395 , [1945].
  • Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 411 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 411 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    tate, this court stated: The rule which has emerged from our decision is “that if, by reason of peculiar facts or circumstances, a pitfall, trap, or snare dangerous to a traveler proceeding with reasonable care is created in respect to a street, a municipality owes a duty to exercise reasonable care to warn or otherwise protect such traveler from the resulting danger.” Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389, 395 , [1945].
  • Larson v. Township of New Haven, Olmsted County 165 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1969
  • Larson v. Township of New Haven, Olmsted County 165 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1969
    The rule which has emerged from our decisions is 2 “that if, by reason of peculiar facts or circumstances, a pitfall, trap, or snare dangerous to a traveler proceeding with reasonable care is created in respect to a street, a municipality owes a duty to exercise reasonable care to warn or otherwise protect such traveler from the resulting danger.” Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389, 395 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130, 134 .
  • Rausch v. Julius B. Nelson and Sons, Inc. 149 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1967
  • Rausch v. Julius B. Nelson and Sons, Inc. 149 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1967
    Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130 ; Klages v. Gillette-Herzog Mfg.
  • Dornack v. Barton Construction Company 137 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 1965
  • Dornack v. Barton Construction Company 137 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 1965
    3 Compare Hanson v. Bailey, 249 Minn. 495 , 83 N. W. (2d) 252 , and Foster v. Herbison Const. Co. 263 Minn. 63 , 115 N. W. (2d) 915 ; Olson v. Hector Const. Co. Inc. 216 Minn. 432 , 13 N. W. (2d) 35 ; Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130 ; McDonald v. Western Union Telegraph Co. Inc. 250 Minn. 406 , 84 N. W. (2d) 630 .
  • Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 136 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1965
  • Thill v. Modern Erecting Company 136 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1965
    App. (2d) 405, 302 P. (2d) 674 ; cf. Pelowski v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. 120 Minn. 108 , ; Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130 .
  • Brasch v. Wesolowsky 138 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1965
  • Brasch v. Wesolowsky 138 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1965
    Defendant claims Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130 , is controlling.
  • Jackson v. City of St. Louis Park 110 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1961
  • Jackson v. City of St. Louis Park 110 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 1961
    The court refused plaintiffs’ request to give the following instruction: “In the absence of anything to the contrary, travelers have a right to assume that a highway that appears to be open and used for public travel has not been discontinued and is reasonably safe for travel.” *99 While this language is taken verbatim from an abstract statement of law quoted in Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389, 397 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130, 135 , and we have condemned instructions framed in this manner, 4 t
  • Dishington v. A. W. Kuettel & Sons, Inc. 96 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1959
  • Dishington v. A. W. Kuettel & Sons, Inc. 96 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1959
    1 See, Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389, 398 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130, 135 .
  • McDonald v. Western Union Telegraph Co., Inc. 84 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1957
  • McDonald v. Western Union Telegraph Co., Inc. 84 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1957
    The court, however, at the time concluded that the special verdict should stand insofar as it decided fact questions on the liability issues in favor of plaintiffs and against the city of Minneapolis, citing Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130 ; Fitzgerald v. Village of Bovey, 174 Minn. 450 , ; Rasmusen v. City of Duluth, 133 Minn. 134 , ; Cunningham v. City of Thief River Falls, 84 Minn. 21 , , in support of its conclusion that the negligence of the city of Minneapolis
  • Ryan v. Griffin 62 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1954
  • Ryan v. Griffin 62 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1954
    Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389, 394 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130, 133 .
  • Donato v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 56 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1952
  • Donato v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 56 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1952
    We are cognizant of the rule in Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130 , where this court held that, although the trial court had directed a verdict on the sole ground of contributory negligence and although findings of contributory negligence as a matter of law were not sustained, nevertheless, the order directing the verdict should be upheld as to any defendant if
  • Shypulski v. Waldorf Paper Products Co. 45 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1951
  • Shypulski v. Waldorf Paper Products Co. 45 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 1951
    See, Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389 , 18 N.W.
  • Martin v. Reibel 34 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1948
  • Martin v. Reibel 34 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1948
    Olson v. Evert, 224 Minn. 528 , 28 N. W. (2d) 753 ; Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389 , 18 N. W. (2d) 130 .
  • Olson v. Evert 28 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1947
  • Olson v. Evert 28 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1947
    Mix v. City of Minneapolis, 219 Minn. 389 , .