DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gorman, 17 N.W.2d 42.

37 citing documents.

  • St. Louis County Thissen, J. Took no part, Moore, J. State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
  • State v. Stein 776 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 2010
  • State v. Stein 776 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 2010
    See, e.g., State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162, 167-69 , -46 (1944) (affirming a murder conviction in a case with “no substantial dispute as to the facts and circumstances” by holding that the jury’s inferential conclusion that the victim’s injuries “could not have been caused by [a fall]” “but only by a blow with an instrument” was “amply sustaine
  • In Re the Welfare of P.W.F. 625 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • In Re the Welfare of P.W.F. 625 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    See State v. Gerdes, 291 Minn. 353, 357 , (proper for trial court to take judicial notice of reliability of radar as a means of establishing speed without requiring operator to be qualified as expert in field of radar); State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162, 173 , -48 (1944) (courts will take judicial notice of fact that $50 is not unusual fee to pay for expert medical testimony).
  • Weaver v. State 408 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Weaver v. State 408 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162, 170 , -47 (1944).
  • State v. Hoskins 193 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Hoskins 193 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1972
    State v. McCabe, supra; State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162
  • State v. Keenan 184 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Keenan 184 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1971
    This court in affirming the conviction quoted United States v. Cariola (D. N. J.) 211 F. Supp. 423, 427 , as follows ( 270 Minn. 70 , 132 N. W. [2d] 724): “* * =1= Mere improvident strategy, bad tactics, mistake, carelessness, or inexperience do not necessarily amount to ineffective assistance of counsel unless taken as a whole the trial was a mockery of justice.” In State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162, 170 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42, 46 , which was also cited in Bailey, this court concluded: “Absent infidel
  • State v. Lundstrom 171 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Lundstrom 171 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1969
    State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162, 167 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42, 45 .
  • State v. Schumann 157 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Schumann 157 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1968
    State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42 .
  • State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
    Even misleading advice by counsel to his client is not ground for relief, unless it clearly rises to the level of unprofessional conduct.” See, also, Mitchell v. United States, 104 App. D. C. 57, 62, 259 F. (2d) 787, 792; State v. Bailey, 270 Minn. 64 , 132 N. W. (2d) 720 ; State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162, 170 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42, 46 ; Annotation, 74 A. L. R. (2d) 1390, 1397.
  • State v. Bailey 132 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Bailey 132 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1965
    His client is entitled to a fair trial, not a perfect one.” *71 This court, in State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162, 170 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42, 46 , said: “Absent infidelity on the part of his attorney, defendant should not be permitted to urge ignorance or incompetence of or mismanagement by the attorney as gound for a new trial, even in a criminal case.
  • State v. Huffstutler 130 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1964
  • State v. Huffstutler 130 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1964
    State v. Silvers, 230 Minn. 12 , 40 N. W. (2d) 630 ; State v. Gress, 250 Minn. 337 , 84 N. W. (2d) 616 ; State v. Rutledge, 142 Minn. 117 , ; State v. Gandel, 173 Minn. 305 , ; State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42 ; State v. Flowers, 262 Minn. 164 , 114 N. W. (2d) 78 .
  • State v. Mlynczak 123 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Mlynczak 123 N.W.2d 358 Minn. 1963
    State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42 .
  • Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
  • Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
    (3 ed.) § 3324; State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42 .
  • State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1958
  • State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1958
    9 State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162, 170, 171 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42, 46, 47 , and cases cited therein.
  • State v. McCabe 87 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1957
  • State v. McCabe 87 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1957
    State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42 .
  • State v. Haynes 80 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1957
  • State v. Haynes 80 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1957
    4 See, State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42 ; State v. Johnson, 173 Minn. 543 , ; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
  • State v. Brady 70 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1955
  • State v. Brady 70 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1955
    Cf. State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N. W. (2d) 458 ; State v. Johnson, 173 Minn. 543 , ; State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42 .
  • State v. Billington 63 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1954
  • State v. Billington 63 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1954
    2 State v. Lindstrom, 180 Minn. 435, 438 , ; see, also, State v. Holden, 42 Minn. 350 , ; State v. Gleeman, 170 Minn. 197 , ; State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42 ; Annotation, 24 A. L. R. 1025.
  • State v. Waltz 54 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1952
  • State v. Waltz 54 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1952
    State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42 ; State v. Kaster, 211 Minn. 119 , ; State v. Johnson, 173 Minn. 543 , ; 2 Dunnell, Dig.