Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by Luhrs, 19 N.W.2d 77.
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Fridley v. Main Street Fridley Properties, LLC 755 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Ex Rel. City of Fridley v. Main Street Fridley Properties, LLC
755 N.W.2d 789
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Eminent-domain proceedings are “special proceedings.” Antl v. State, 220 Minn. 129 , 133
- Johnson v. City of Shorewood 531 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Johnson v. City of Shorewood
531 N.W.2d 509
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Antl v. State, 220 Minn. 129 , 133
- Duluth Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. City of Duluth 520 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Duluth Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. City of Duluth
520 N.W.2d 775
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Eminent domain proceedings are “special proceedings.” Anti v. State, 220 Minn. 129 , 133
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co. 503 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co.
503 N.W.2d 799
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Antl v. State, 220 Minn. 129 , the supreme court stated: “Condemnatory proceedings in the exercise of the right of eminent domain are not civil actions or causes within the meaning of the constitution, but special proceedings, only quasi judicial in their nature.” Id.
- Judd v. State ex rel. Humphrey 488 N.W.2d 507 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Judd v. State ex rel. Humphrey
488 N.W.2d 507
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Eminent domain proceedings are “special proceedings.” Antl v. State, 220 Minn. 129 , 133
- Park & Recreation Board of Minneapolis v. Carl Bolander & Sons Property 436 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Park & Recreation Board of Minneapolis v. Carl Bolander & Sons Property
436 N.W.2d 481
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
DECISION Eminent domain proceedings are “special proceedings.” Antl v. State, 220 Minn. 129 , 133
- Town of Lebanon v. Land Holding Co. 143 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1966
- In Re Application of Sister Kenny Foundation, Inc. 126 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1964
- Miller v. Market Men's Mutual Insurance 115 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1962
- Village of Roseville v. Sunset Memorial Park Assn. Inc. 113 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1962
- State, by Lord v. Frisby 108 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1961
- State ex rel. Peterson v. Anderson 69 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1955
- State v. Anderson 58 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1953
- Chapman v. Dorsey 230 Minn. 279 Minn. 1950
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Bentley 28 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1947
-
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Bentley
28 N.W.2d 179
Minn. 1947
We held in In re Condemnation of Lands Owned by Luhrs, 220 Minn. 129 , 135-138 , , 80-82 , that an order granting a motion to intervene in condemnation proceedings, determining *Page 246 that property has been taken, and appointing commissioners to ascertain damages is not appealable.