DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 18 N.W.2d 582.

43 citing documents.

  • Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 620 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 620 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541, 554 , (reversing and remanding for new trial where district court erroneously admitted evidence of insurance); see also Minn.R.Evid.
  • Fisher v. Edberg 176 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1970
  • Fisher v. Edberg 176 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1970
    Jablinske v. Eckstrom, supra; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 .
  • Seeger v. Dalton 172 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1969
  • Seeger v. Dalton 172 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1969
    Plaintiff cites as authority for reinstating the verdicts Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Johnson v. Mancilman, 241 Minn. 461 , 63 N. W. (2d) 569 ; and Jablinske v. Eckstrom, 247 Minn. 140 , 76 N. W. (2d) 654 .
  • Schafer v. Pierce 150 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1967
  • Schafer v. Pierce 150 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1967
    Compare Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 , and DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , .
  • Spaulding v. Zimmerman 116 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1962
  • Spaulding v. Zimmerman 116 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1962
    There are, however, numerous decisions holding that insurance limitations have no part in the trial of actions relating to personal injuries or property damage, Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Lee v. Osmundson, 206 Minn. 487 , ; see, also, Brown v. Murphy Transfer & Storage Co. 190 Minn. 81 , ; and it would seem fairly clear that the principles governing this rule would be equally applicable here.
  • State v. McCarthy 104 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1960
  • State v. McCarthy 104 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1960
    See, McKnight v. City of Duluth, 181 Minn. 450 , ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Foster v. Butler, 207 Minn. 286 , .
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
    11 Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Jablinske v. Eckstrom, 247 Minn. 140 , 76 N. W. (2d) 654 ; Johnson v. Mancilman, 241 Minn. 461 , 63 N. W. (2d) 569 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 .
  • Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 77 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1956
  • Jablinske v. Eckstrom 76 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
  • Jablinske v. Eckstrom 76 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
    1 Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Johnson v. Mancilman, 241 Minn. 461 , 63 N. W. (2d) 569 .
  • Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
  • Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
    Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; see, 6 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Kolatz v. Kelly 69 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1955
  • Kolatz v. Kelly 69 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1955
    Norling v. Stempf, 208 Minn. 143 , ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541, 545 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582, 585 ; Demmer v. Grunke, 230 Minn. 188, 194-195 , 42 N. W. (2d) 1, 6 ; Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413, 421 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40, 45 ; Kraus v. Saffert, 208 Minn. 220, 225 , ; see, Johnston v. Jordan, 193 Minn. 298, 300 , .
  • Ostrowski v. Mockridge 65 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1954
  • Ostrowski v. Mockridge 65 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1954
    In Odegard v. Connolly, 211 Minn. 342, 345 , 1 N. W. (2d) 137, 139 , it was stated: “* * * So long as the insurance is not featured or made the basis at the trial for an appeal to increase or decrease the damages, the information would seem to be without prejudice.” In the cases relied upon by defendant (Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. [2d] 582; Lee v. Osmundson, 206 Minn. 487 , ; Prescott v. Swanson, 197 Minn. 325 , ; Brown v. Murphy Transfer & Storage Co. 190 Minn. 81 , ),
  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
    Co. 218 Minn. 532 , 16 N. W. (2d) 758 ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
  • Johnson v. Mancilman 63 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1954
  • Johnson v. Mancilman 63 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1954
    Co. 230 Minn. 393 , 41 N. W. (2d) 804 ; Martin v. Reibel, 227 Minn. 106 , 34 N. W. (2d) 290 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 .
  • Maher v. Roisner 57 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1953
  • Maher v. Roisner 57 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1953
    See, Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Krenik v. Westerman, 201 Minn. 255 , ; Evans v. C. M. & St.
  • Schrader v. Kriesel 45 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1950
  • Schrader v. Kriesel 45 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1950
    Co. 218 Minn. 532 , 16 N. W. (2d) 758 ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. v. Snuggins (8 Cir.) 103 F. (2d) 458; see, also, 4 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Halloran v. Tousignant 41 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1950
  • Halloran v. Tousignant 41 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1950
    is, as to whether the automobiles approached the intersection at approximately the same time, as to which automobile (if any) entered the intersection first, whether a collision would occur if each continued in its course and maintained its speed, and whether violation of the right-of-way rule was the proximate cause of the collision, are fact questions for the jury.” Cf. Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Ristow v. Von Berg, 211 Minn. 150 , ; Utgard v. Helmerson, 202 Mi
  • Martin v. Reibel 34 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1948
  • Martin v. Reibel 34 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1948
    Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Guthrie v. Brown, 192 Minn. 434 , .
  • Bosell v. Rannestad 33 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1948
  • Bosell v. Rannestad 33 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1948
    Mattfeld v. Nester, supra; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 .
  • Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
  • Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
    Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 .
  • Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'n 28 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1947
  • Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'n 28 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1947
    Guthrie v. Brown, 192 Minn. 434 , ; Montague v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co. 194 Minn. 546 , ; Nye v. Bach, 196 Minn. 330 , ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 .
  • Leitner v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. 26 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1947
  • Leitner v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. 26 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1947
    could be gained by a lengthy discussion of the authorities or by attempting to set out all the facts and circumstances shown by the evidence in the case.” Among many other cases involving accidents at intersections of streets and highways, the following are deemed helpful: Bell v. Pickett, 178 Minn. 540 , ; Jacobsen v. Ahasay, 188 Minn. 179 , ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 .