Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co., 18 N.W.2d 121.
- Thake v. Backhauls, Inc. 345 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1984
-
Thake v. Backhauls, Inc.
345 N.W.2d 745
Minn. 1984
Co., 219 Minn. 381, 388 , , we said: “Where, upon circumstantial evidence in civil cases, there is a reasonable basis for diverse inferences, the choice of an inference made by the fact-finding body is to be sustained, unless (1) the conflicting inferences stand in equilibrium so that reasonable minds cannot prefer on
- Republic National Life Insurance v. Marquette Bank & Trust Co. 251 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1977
- Republic National Life Insurance v. Marquette Bank & Trust Co. 251 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1977
- Funk v. A. F. Scheppmann & Son Construction Co. 199 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1972
-
Funk v. A. F. Scheppmann & Son Construction Co.
199 N.W.2d 791
Minn. 1972
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , and reiterated in Vroman v. City of Austin, 284 Minn. 541 , is upon the claimant to establish, without speculation or conjecture, that the injury or death arose out of or in the course of his employment, a burden clearly not met on this record.
- Vroman v. City of Austin 169 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1969
-
Vroman v. City of Austin
169 N.W.2d 61
Minn. 1969
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 181 N. W. (2d) 121 , to establish, without speculation or conjecture, that the injury and death arose out of and in the course of - the employee’s employment.
- Olson v. Felix 146 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1966
-
Olson v. Felix
146 N.W.2d 866
Minn. 1966
Co. 219 Minn. 381, 388 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121, 124 , we said: ‘“Where, upon circumstantial evidence in civil cases, there is a reasonable basis for diverse inferences, the choice of an inference made by the fact-finding body is to be sustained, unless (1) the conflicting inferences stand in equilibrium so that reasonable minds cannot pref
- Beckel v. Alexander 134 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1965
-
Beckel v. Alexander
134 N.W.2d 304
Minn. 1965
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 .
- Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
-
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc.
133 N.W.2d 484
Minn. 1965
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; Anderson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 223 Minn. 1 , 26 N. W. (2d) 355 ; Hanson v. Homeland Ins.
- Johnson v. Lorraine Park Apts. Inc. 128 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1964
-
Johnson v. Lorraine Park Apts. Inc.
128 N.W.2d 758
Minn. 1964
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; Anderson v. Northern States Power Co. 236 Minn. 196 , 52 N. W. (2d) 434 ; Hagsten v. Simberg, 232 Minn. 160 , 44 N. W. (2d) 611 ; State, by Burnquist, v. Paskewitz, 233 Minn. 452 , 47 N. W. (2d) 199 ; Collings v. Northwestern Hospital, 202 Minn. 139 , ; Smock v. Mankato Elks Club, 2
- Majerus v. Guelsow 113 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1962
-
Majerus v. Guelsow
113 N.W.2d 450
Minn. 1962
Co. 219 Minn. 381, 388 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121, 124 , “it is not necessary that the evidence in support of the inference adopted [by the fact-finder] must outweigh other reasonable inferences so as to demonstrate their impossibility.” In Paine v. Gamble Stores, Inc. 202 Minn. 462 , , 116 A. L. R. 407, defendant was shown to b
- Fogarty v. Martin Hotel Co. 101 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1960
-
Fogarty v. Martin Hotel Co.
101 N.W.2d 601
Minn. 1960
Co. 219 Minn. 381, 388 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121, 124 , we said: “Where, upon, circumstantial evidence in civil cases, there is a rea *404 sonable basis for diverse inferences, the choice of an inference made by the fact-finding body is to be sustained, unless (1) the conflicting inferences stand in equilibrium so that reasonable minds canno
- Lange v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission 99 N.W.2d 915 Minn. 1959
-
Lange v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission
99 N.W.2d 915
Minn. 1959
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 .
- Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
-
Burdick v. Bongard
96 N.W.2d 868
Minn. 1959
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
- Schmillen v. Dave Schroeder Grocery 85 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1957
-
Schmillen v. Dave Schroeder Grocery
85 N.W.2d 740
Minn. 1957
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 .
- Chillstrom v. Trojan Seed Co. 65 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1954
-
Chillstrom v. Trojan Seed Co.
65 N.W.2d 888
Minn. 1954
Co. 219 Minn. 381, 387 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121, 124 , we stated: “Here, the best witness, the employe, is dead, and it would indeed be difficult for the surviving dependent to establish that death arose out of and in the course of his employment if it were not permissible to draw reasonable inferences from the facts known to exist.” In Hen
- Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co. 61 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1953
-
Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co.
61 N.W.2d 225
Minn. 1953
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; Hagsten v. Simberg, 232 Minn. 160 , 44 N. W. (2d) 611 ; Standafer v. First Nat.
- Stephen v. Miles Construction Co. 60 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1953
-
Stephen v. Miles Construction Co.
60 N.W.2d 801
Minn. 1953
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co. 214 Minn. 548 , 9 N. W. (2d) 237 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
- Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 59 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1953
-
Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn.
59 N.W.2d 883
Minn. 1953
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
- Westling v. Holm 58 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1953
-
Westling v. Holm
58 N.W.2d 252
Minn. 1953
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 .
- Jurich v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. 46 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1951
-
Jurich v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co.
46 N.W.2d 237
Minn. 1951
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 .
- Schmoll v. J. W. Craig Co. 37 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1949
-
Schmoll v. J. W. Craig Co.
37 N.W.2d 539
Minn. 1949
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
- Eischen v. Fairmont Canning Co. 30 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1948
-
Eischen v. Fairmont Canning Co.
30 N.W.2d 586
Minn. 1948
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
- Tillman v. Stanley Iron Works 24 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1946
-
Tillman v. Stanley Iron Works
24 N.W.2d 903
Minn. 1946
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 .
- Larson v. Le Mere 18 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1945
-
Larson v. Le Mere
18 N.W.2d 696
Minn. 1945
Co. 219 Minn. 381 , 18 N. W. (2d) 121 ; Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co. 214 Minn. 548 , 9 N. W. (2d) 237 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.